• Rand0mA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Have used a few coding models and they are good, but they will not replace a programmer. You can ask for a class to be made, or a method. You can ask it to find issues or improvements with/for your code or spot mistakes, but it can’t hack multiple modules and give you a fully working complex app. It’ll help you learn to code, it’ll write you whatever you ask, but when you start adding the fact you need to know about X for y and z is also important it starts forgetting the original prompt.

    Don’t get me wrong. It’s really good. But it’s a tool, not a full on master coder.

    Looking forward to getting more tokens to work with on a normal computer. Happy to wait for the CPU to gen code considering the ridiculous prices of high VRAM GPUs these days, but it’s still fisher price ‘My first AI coding assistant’. Give it a few more years, a few more breakthroughs and we will get there.

    I have tried GPT Engineer… it’s not there yet. Will make you a simple app, but it’s not going to knock out anything more than modular microshite.

    • fizgigtiznalkie@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve found they really help with unit tests. Sometimes with regular code they straight up make up libraries that aren’t real.

      • CoopaLoopa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Google Bard is the worst when it comes to powershell modules. Every time you ask it for a way to get some info from an O365 tenant, it makes up a Get-ExactlyTheDataYouWant module that doesn’t actually exist.

        Bing AI is actually pretty good when it comes to basic powershell commands; I figure MS probably trained it on their own scripting language.

  • trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is this article trying to imply meta had a choice in the matter when llama’s code has been available online for the better part of a year?

  • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    And if it was actually good and fully usable they’d just use it themselves to make billions…

    Imagine you could just write a specification for any software project in the world (even invest some programmers and project managers to do it together with reviews), throw it at the AI and you get a fully functioning program out. Preferably even with a DevOps pipeline set up, so all you have to do is copy it into AWS, Azure or whatever, throw money at it and you’re done.

    They wouldn’t give that away, lol.

    • The Dark Lord ☑️@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Definitely not how it works. It’ll be a tool for programmers to make them more efficient. It’ll be like the difference between a hammer and nails and a nail gun. You still need the worker to know where to put the nail.

      • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Writing code is fast, checking it’s correct and debugging is slow. If some AI spits out 2000 lines of code it won’t make you faster at all.

        • Teppic@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Have you tried asking ChatGPT or Bard to write you code to do something? It is actually remarkably good at it.
          That and being an alternative to a thesaurus is about all I use LLMs for.

          • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Lol, yeah, and it hallucinates all the time. You also use it to just write a little bit of new code, you can’t give it a 100k lines code base and tell it to actually add or modify something…

            • Teppic@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Indeed, and for me giving me a rough framework to modify is hugely useful and time saving. As the commenter above said it’s a tool, it’s not a team member.

            • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              With code it doesn’t hallucinate all that much if you prompt well.

              Ive created complex powershell scripts with it. I never used powershell before. Some actual developers checked my work and admitted that they where impressed, questioned why someone with my skill didn’t pursue the career of dev. my prior Experience is failing at programming class (was never any good at writing my own code, just understand it reasonably well. ) and modding games. The programming teacher i had hinted that i should find something else.

              My work now offered. I looked at the powershell classes, the stuff i am doing daily is covered by the advanced class which i can only do if i succeed the basic class. I don’t expect to learn much.

              Chatgpt is the best teacher i ever had. Yes it makes mistakes but so did every other teacher i ever had. Chatgpt at least adapts if i call out its bullshit.

              • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Sheesh, trying to get a PowerShell script to do something you can learn in a day or two (if you’re interested).

                Actual programming is mostly grabbing a larger system (or micro services), interacting with other interfaces and databases, modifying and extending existing code (which is what I do 99% of the time, it’s really rare to write something new from the ground up in most companies). DevOps where you might also handle deployment pipelines. And so on.

                You always work in bigger systems. Sure, sometimes you write helper scripts, but that’s the easy stuff.

                So yes, I can obviously ask ChatGPT to set up a REST API for me with a handful of endpoints and it will do that reasonably well. If I also want it to connect to a database though it might try to set that up, but that will fail (as you have to actually do steps yourself to make it work). It’s good for boilerplate code, but nothing more than that.

                • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  “programming is mostly grabbing a larger system (or micro services), interacting with other interfaces and databases, modifying and extending existing code”

                  Yes, i just happen to use powershell to make the api calls to maken changes in the database because thats what my job said i should use. Then i extend the functionality of what the scripts can do by modifying the code. Chatgpt was a great help at providing a quality result, much more then i would on my own.

                  No it doesnt replace the job of a actual programmers, no one expects it to do that for the time being.

        • ZILtoid1991@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Also many programmers write their own stuff for generating boilerplate code, with some languages like D having a strong support for it via its metaprogramming features. All while being more reliable.