• Ashyr@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Basically Disney is keeping a lot of the same creatives behind the original Daredevil, but intend to use season 1 pay rates because they tacked, ‘Born Again’ on to the title.

    Pretty gross penny pinching from one of the wealthiest media corporations in the world.

    • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, look at any of the Disney channel series, they all change the name slightly to reset the season and avoid union required pay increases. One example: The Suite Life… which was split into 2-3 season series.

  • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It is a complete reboot though isn’t it? The original show on Netflix isn’t part of the canon of this one? If so then I don’t really get their complaint.

    • Value Subtracted@startrek.websiteOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even if they wipe the continuity, which is still very unclear, is it really fair to call it a “complete reboot” when they’re using the same cast for the most prominent roles?

    • qdJzXuisAndVQb2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A tonne of the same cast are returning. Bernthal is still the Punisher, D’Onofrio is still Kingpin… no, this is a calculated decision to pay the workers less.

      • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Same actors != not a reboot. Iirc they’re going to have gal gadot as Wonder Woman again but are rebooting her character so the 2 previous movies are not canon, didn’t happen.

        If they’re making a new series that has literally nothing to do with the previous one, zero connection to anything that happened in it, how is it not a reboot? Should they use different actors just to justify it being a reboot?

        • qdJzXuisAndVQb2@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am fully in agreement with you, although I can see why you and others didn’t take that from my initial comment. The calculated decision I referred to was Disney’s cynical claim that this is a reboot. They’re shafting workers, we can all see it.

      • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        From everything I’ve read, all people associated with it are calling it a reboot and not a continuation of the previous show.