• drcouzelis@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    To anyone reading this article, only the first quarter of it is about the beliefs and political stance of the developers. The rest of the article after that goes into more technical reasons.

    • IHeartBadCode@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      All I needed to read was in the first paragraph.

      Brave Software, the company behind the browser of the same name, was founded by Brendan Eich. He’s best known as the creator of JavaScript from his days at Netscape Communications

      I mean, JS is his baby that’s all there needs to be said about the person’s motivations.

      • wxboss@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “JS is his baby that’s all there needs to be said about the person’s motivations.”

        During these formative years of the Web, web pages could only be static, lacking the capability for dynamic behavior after the page was loaded in the browser. There was a desire in the flourishing web development scene to remove this limitation, so in 1995, Netscape decided to add a scripting language to Navigator. They pursued two routes to achieve this: collaborating with Sun Microsystems to embed the Java programming language, while also hiring Brendan Eich to embed the Scheme language.”

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JavaScript

        I think you’re confusing the reasons behind the initial intent of JS versus what it has evolved into almost 30 years later.

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Very strongly worded, but yes.

    Brave have had a history of controversy since their inception. Every time something happens, the CEO went on a marketing campaign across social media and drummed up enough new users to drown it out. However the attitude of the business is clear: it would take a very small sack of money for Brave to sell out its users.

    If you’re going to use a Chromium web browser, there are non-commercial open source projects that don’t have a history of shady shit. However Firefox forks are better.

    • catacomb@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Absoutely. I mostly use Firefox because I’m so familiar with it by now but the privacy is generally much better and it doesn’t have a massive monopoly on the web. I’m just a lot more comfortable with it.

      When I have to, I use ungoogled-chromium on desktop and Bromite on mobile. I recommend those to anyone familiar with Chrome.

  • Boozilla@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have stopped using Brave. Fuck those guys.

    I just wish Firefox would update less frequently. It’s way too often.

        • kungen@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why don’t you run the update service? Or if you do, how does the few seconds it takes to apply the update really impact you? I never even realize it apparently updates so much as it doesn’t nag or anything.

  • Rbon@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I currently use brave on iOS to block YouTube ads. Is there any other option right now? I’d be willing to switch.

    • corvid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The best solution on iOS is Yattee. You can add Piped or Invidious instances as locations and stream ad-free YouTube from there. Another solution that doesn’t involve Piped and Invidious is AdGuard. Open a YouTube link in Safari, hit actions, then hit Block YouTube Ads (by AdGuard).