• dariusj18@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I would hesitate to call it terrorism, it was targeted at military persons with an intent at military disruption and any public casualties were collateral damage. It may have been a war crime though.

        • hoch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 minutes ago

          I don’t think you can just call things you don’t like a ‘war crime’

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Sabotaging dual-use communications devices that are used, specifically, by members of an enemy paramilitary group is not a clear-cut war crime. On the other hand, there is a very strong argument that ‘blind-firing’ such devices en-masse without regard for the proximity of civilians or possibility of civilian harm is a war crime via insufficiently discerning use of force. But even that is something that could probably be argued in a legitimately-unbiased international court - not that it’ll ever fucking get to one, considering Israel’s history with international courts.

          Either way, it’s a shite move that was only meant to escalate the situation so Bibi can stay in power a few more minutes. Vile shit.