• agent_nycto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 days ago

    Can’t wait till neurodivergent becomes the new slur and we invent a new word to describe it so people use that instead of a slur which then becomes the new slur so we invent another new word to describe it so people use that instead of a slur which then …

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      i hope instead the cycle could be broken in some way. :/ other folks in the thread are pointing out that ND is a term created by its own community, which could add to its resilience. i hope they are right!

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      correct, it’s not (or shouldn’t be), but it’s being used as one, especially recently!

      precontext: i said i could see both sides of some non-important debate. something about whether a community mod should be heavy or light with bans, and i was like, “well it depends on what the motivations and needs are.”

      their response to that?

      in this post i hope to call attention to the same destructive processes happening to “neurodiverse” as to all the other terms. particularly i want to call out the ableist motivations behind it.

        • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          precisely? never said otherwise :) to quote another person right in this thread whom i agree with:

          It’s an insult because of intent, not because of the word itself, though.

          • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            I’m autistic, adhd, and I had a brain injury. Triple neurodivergent. 🙄

            Go ahead and block me, I don’t really care, I think without context you taking offense to calling someone who is gullible “neurodivergent” seems over sensitive. Autistic people in particular unfortunately can be gullible and people abuse that.

            • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              okay sorry. i had no patience at the time to try to walk you through how the above is an obvious insult. unblocking because i value ND individuals having a voice, thanks for being chill and bearing with me in my stupidity

              • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 days ago

                Really unkind in which threads? Yeah, I’m an asshole about politics, because I’ve had it up to here with backstabbing liberals who vote blue no matter who and scold the left while losing elections like it’s their job (because it is, they exist as a ratchet to prevent any kind of left wing reform). I’ve spent the last two and a half decades watching this country fall to fascism while there’s zero real opposition to it. As a queer neurodivergent I don’t have any more patience left for liberals.

                • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  ugh i apologize. i can’t find any specific incidents that i remember so i must be incorrect. yesterday i was quite frustrated at people implicitly calling me a liar or overly sensitive to something that was quite obvious to me and i remembered your username and the vibe of your “asshole about politics” behavior (which is totally understandable btw) so i made a snap decision to single you out rather than checking the actual quality of what i remember.

                  you have my formal apology. this place is hella stressful and i do my best to be kind but this was an instance where i failed that, and it impacted you semi-directly.

                  give me a few minutes i’ll remove all my baseless and unkind commentary surrounding you.

        • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Bingo. I assumed more people understood this, so I apologize for not communicating clearly. Any word can become an insult—with the right people in control. What’s particularly hurtful is seeing words that marginalized or oppressed groups use to describe their own experiences being co-opted and turned into insults, reinforcing their otherness.

          It happened with “removed,” as with “idiot,” and so many others. Recently, I’ve seen it happen with more niche phrases (look up “is X acoustic” if you’re unfamiliar). Just the other day, I made a comment that I could see two perspectives on a matter. Instead of simply calling me wrong, someone said, “You must be neurodivergent, you’re so gullible.” In that context, “neurodivergent” was clearly being used as a stand-in for the r-slur.

          To be clear, I am not against any language. I’m against the weaponizing of language.

          • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            👍🏻

            What’s interesting about the word removed specifically is it’s still used as a technical term that has nothing to do with developmental disabilities - for example, fire removedant - to slow/stop something.

            • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              right, i mean thats just kind of a side effect of language existing

              a similar concept appears in the terms “dumbwaiter,” “dumbfounded,” “dumbstruck” wherein “dumb” literally just meant mechanical/nonspeaking, and had none of the other implications of disability-related muteness it has now.

              obviously “dumb” carries a lot less weight these days than the r slur, but the existence of etymologically related terms doesn’t give an “out” to people using them for offense and denigration in either case

              • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                but the existence of etymologically related terms doesn’t give an “out” to people using them for offense and denigration in either case

                Never said it did. I remember the first time I saw removed being used in a technical sense and being thrown by it’s usage in todays world. Ultimately though you can’t police language, people are gonna say whatever dumb shit they want, doesn’t mean you have to listen. And no, anyone using “dumb” or “idiot” today is not referring to disabled people, those words stopped being used to describe disabled people multiple decades ago and are far removed from being associated with disabled people. removed is a lot more recent, but even as a kid growing up in the 90s where calling people gay, queer and faggots were acceptable, even removed used as a slur back then was frowned upon.

                • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Never said it did.

                  no worries! i wasn’t saying you said that, just returning to the thesis of my post :)

                  again, as i said two comments above. this is a descriptive post, not perscriptive. my main concern is to make people aware of the pattern, not to tell them what to do about it.

  • Squorlple@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’ve been thinking about how we call people “right-handed” and “left-handed” instead of “handedness-typical” and “handedness-divergent”

    • VerdantSporeSeasoning@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I have an older family member who is severely mentally disabled and always has been. His medical records diagnosed him as r*tarded. The adults diagnosing him at the time didn’t understand enough about mental conditions and their differences when he was a child. So kids like him were diagnosed with that. It did have more ‘legitimate’ uses than it does in our current context. Doesn’t make it good or right, doesn’t mean they shouldn’t have tried to be more specific either. That legacy leads to now where we have the nuance and resources to do better. I am glad it’s more and more relagated to the past as it’s consistently been used to dehumanize people.

      • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        The euphemism treadmill rather implies we simply load all the meaning and intention on a new word when the old one becomes unacceptable.

        But that clearly isn’t the case with this series of words. Many of these words have clearly different meanings and different social stigmas, and some are in use at the same time.

        • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          not at all what im discussing but, glad you were able to come to your own conclusion on this

          for my part, no opinion. i just think calling people ableist insults is bad.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      I mean I’d say the asterisk is overdoing it, and that this is mostly because removed isn’t used as a medical diagnosis anymore. If it does ever really die expect special needs or another such word to take its place.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Oftentimes people ask me why I bother using the asterisk at all. And the answer isn’t to pay respect to those who have been othered for their entire lives by this language, or to minimize the chance of a ban from heavyhanded mods. It’s actually to make you upset, specifically.

  • Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    6 days ago

    Idk man, a good chunk of these are just sorta not that associated with their origins anymore. A lot of insults are historically demeaning towards certain groups (especially poor people).

  • juliebean@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    6 days ago

    today i learned that ‘cretin’ has ableist origins. just hearing the word, and being completely unaware of its origins, i assumed it had racist origins and was somehow related to the isle of crete.

    apparently ‘cretinism’ is an old-timey word for congenital iodine deficiency syndrome.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      okay wow TIL too! i was just pulling from memory and a few online examples but i never dove into the specific histories of that particular word!

  • Julian@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 days ago

    Interesting. Feels like there’s a bit of a paradox, where we need a term to address a group of people who are being “othered,” but while that’s the case, there will be people who use that term as an insult.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      the better strategy might be to investigate and challenge what forces cause people to use ableist insults

      • Julian@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        6 days ago

        True. Or just discard their attempts to taint the language. Like how some slurs have been reclaimed.

        • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          yea! reclamation is my personal fav cuz its so gorgeously petty

  • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    Just about any term that refers to someone else can be used as an insult!

    So as the old saying goes “offense is taken, not given”. If you want to be insulted, you will be.

    I find, people who insult others are saying more about their own character, than that of the target.

  • sunbather@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    seeing as ableist terms are always rooted in previously uncontroversial medical terms i propose the term “the swag ones”

  • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    There are limited examples of this effect working in reverse. Take the word “Nice” for example. Nice back in ye old medieval times used to be a synonym for “stupid” or “simple” so saying someone was “nice” was insulting. Then there was this prolonged long fad where things being very plain and straightforward was considered a good thing and “Nice/simple” gained a positive connotation. Saying someone is “simple” or a “simpleton” retains this original sort of vibe but “Nice” now just means pleasant.

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      6 days ago

      Anything is ableist if that’s the intention is to be ableist. “Cognitive impairment” or “Brain damage” are clinical terms, but if one decides they can also be ableist insults.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      it’s not, unless there is intent. i see draconic left a great reaponse to you so i will give that my seal of approval instead of rewriting.

  • SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    du hast doch lack gesoffen “idiot”, “neurodivergent” & “lame” als abelism zu bezeichnen.

    was so angry/disappointed in that post that i couldn’t get the message across with English.

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Who are you to tell me which words I can and cannot use? You can judge my intent, not my vocabulary. Im asking for permission to smoke and swear.

  • latenightnoir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    “You’re not normal! You CAN’T be normal, because then I’ll no longer be THE normal! SHUT UP, THIS IS THE CONDITIONER FOR THE THREAD BY WHICH MY SANITY IS HANGING!”

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      “how can i have an identity without establishing and then demonizing an outgroup!?!”