Victoria has banned native logging on Crown land from next year.

The Greens, environment groups, and sections of the federal Labor Party all want a nationwide end to native logging.

A motion to end logging across Australia was defeated at the Labor Party’s national conference in Brisbane this week, after strong lobbying from senior Labor figures.

“The decent thing here is that Tasmania should be following Victoria and Western Australia, and ending native logging and destruction and extinction of our species,” former Greens Senator Bob Brown recently told the ABC. Environment groups are thrilled about the impending end of Victoria’s native timber industry.

Victorian Agriculture Minister Gayle Tierney conceded the decision was hastened by costly legal action taken by environment groups that halted logging in the state’s Central Highlands and East Gippsland regions.

  • Minarble@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 months ago

    If the dickheads actually managed it and followed the rules proactively instead of bending and ignoring them. Reforest like they are supposed to it would be better to harvest sustainability locally rather than from rainforest overseas.

    It is because they can’t do their own job properly and with vision that the backlash has intensified.

    • INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I cant see why any body would push to continue logging of old growth. Who would want it continuing if they aren’t getting something out of it?

      …Kickbacks?

  • mattym00cow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I support this however, I’d love to see more funding go to fuel management ahead of bushfire seasons. I wonder if this will make that situation worse if there isn’t a correlational increase in spending there.

    • Salvo@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think it needs to be balanced, Fuel management is very important and should be the number 1 concern, but our native bush is Pyrophytic with a cycle that lasts about 20 years.

      Indigenously, A fire would come through and decimate sections of bush. It would burn down old, dying trees and cause Pyrophytic plants to begin they 5 year germination cycle. In the meantime Wattles and She-Oaks would replenish the nitrogen back into the soil. You can see how the bush recovers if your travel out to Croajingalong.

      Eventually, the Pyrophytic plants like Eucalypt and Banksia start to take over the Wattle and She-Oaks, where the begin to dominate the bush again.

      After about 10-15 years, the Eucalypts reach middle age and are at their peak; that is were the start to go downhill and do all the bad things that they are known for; not producing new shoots, dropping branches into cars, tents and buildings with no warning and generally being a menace to civilisation.

      This is where we reach a crossroads; we can continue letting it become overgrown so it will catch fire naturally, we can actively burn it to the ground again, we can maliciously clearfell or we can responsibly harvest any salvageable material as building materials, while leaving unsalvageable material as habitat, and then do fuel control while monitoring the welfare of wildlife.

      The last option is A) the most responsible for our civilised society B) the most labour intensive and expensive C) the most profitable for the economy.

        • Salvo@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          No worries, I was hoping that someone would call me out because not all Australian Forest is Pyrophytic.

          The Huon Valley and the Daintree are both examples of where logging and land clearing are not renewable.

  • Treevan 🇦🇺@aussie.zoneOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I guess it’s like CSG and coal. We know it’s bad but we have to keep doing it apparently.

    It’s one of those old school bandaids that has really welded with your leg hair.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    “The decent thing here is that Tasmania should be following Victoria and Western Australia, and ending native logging and destruction and extinction of our species,” former Greens Senator Bob Brown recently told the ABC.

    Wilderness Society national campaigns director Amelia Young said vast areas of forest in Victoria had been “badly mismanaged” for too long.

    But some experts fear the loss of local timber will have devastating consequences for many developing nations, hasten the destruction of whole ecosystems and accelerate the extinction of perilously threatened species.

    Forestry Australia president Michelle Freeman said the end of local timber production, had seen a recent escalation in imports from countries like the United States, China, Brazil, and Indonesia.

    Victorian Agriculture Minister Gayle Tierney conceded the decision was hastened by costly legal action taken by environment groups that halted logging in the state’s Central Highlands and East Gippsland regions.

    Wellington Shire Mayor Ian Bye said recently, via a Freedom of Information request, the council received numerous heavily redacted cabinet documents.


    The original article contains 738 words, the summary contains 160 words. Saved 78%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!