deleted by creator

I admit I clicked hoping for an automation game. There’s definitely a factory portion where you place down machines to make the guns, an indoor factory, which is something I was looking for awhile back. Not sure how much of the game is the factory portion, so I’ll wait and see before I post it to !automationgames@lemmy.zip.

The first thing that stands out to me with the graphics is that the text somehow doesn’t feel very good visually. The rest passes well enough. It’s an Early Access release that came out April 4, no demo, so I’ll be watching closely.

Some 2D artwork on our game is based on AI generation.

Oooof. Really do not appreciate that, so this probably will not be such a high priority for me to check out then. I’ve dismissed games that appeal more to me for using AI, so I wonder why I’m not immediately mentally binning this one.

Time Management tag

I haven’t seen that phrase to describe a game’s genre in awhile! I loved time management games growing up, should probably poke around in that tag on Steam for a bit.

Graphics… do not really look all that cohesive, which is a shame because I like the premise of running a bookshop, and because the NPC image is in a style I like.

There’s a wonderful contrarian-but-is-it-really-considering-it’s-making-the-lawful-choice delight in trying to follow the rules in a game about breaking rules.

No-commentary video of someone just driving in GTA trying to follow the rules of the road. I’m usually really not a video person, but just watching this feels nice somehow.

puts you in the role typically taken up by NPCs in other… RPGs

Games with this concept instantly grab my attention.

How much virus exposure will you risk for a shortcut through the main quest?

Now I am curious if by this they mean “whatever the usual protagonist of the RPG is doing,” and if so whether the game makes it explicit to you, directly coming out and saying “this is the hero of the story, and here’s their main quest path!” or if you infer it. Both could be enjoyable.

Although unfortunately the post-apocalypse thing makes this a hard no for me ;-;

deleted by creator

For my previous posts, like this one on Gunfire Reborn, I went to the “Create a post” form and used the “upload picture” button on the toolbar of the main body text field.

Works perfectly. Cannot figure out why I had trouble getting several images in one post, even though I’ve used this exact tool in the past before. Thanks for helping!

Premise of that game is making me ask: have you played Ghost Trick before?

Wow, nice writeup!

I’ll admit I’m disappointed that jazz music is not prominent enough in the game to get mentioned. I clicked on this post because of the jazz in jazzstronauts.

How did you get all the images at once, upload beforehand (whether to Lemmy or somewhere else offsite) and that is how you have a link? Repeated editing so Lemmy accepts each new image upload?

I gave Mindustry a shot and faded out at the tower defense bit of the tutorial. I do like !automationgames@lemmy.zip even though tower defense is not my thing, so I’m wondering: how do you manage to forget enemies and just make it a logistics game?

This is such a cool idea. Nudging a few things around and trying to see what ripple effects they have…

I always like to see people who go all in on the roleplaying in RPGs.

I do wish people would leave mods that aren’t for them alone. There are a bunch of mods extremely not to my taste that I just scroll past instead of intentionally clicking to tell the mod author just how much it is not to my taste and that they should not have made it because I am uninterested in the content.

There are a few mobile or web idle/incremental games I have used as a substitute for a Pomodoro timer. Oh, I am really into the game and it only progresses if this is the focused tab? I really want to make progress, but I am in a period of the game where active play isn’t that rewarded, and just watching the screen while I wait to earn the upgrade is pretty boring? How about we just leave my phone with that as the active tab, and I check back when the upgrade should be earned? Keeps me off my phone and doing the actual things I should be doing instead. Somehow, “abusing” games like this works better for me than the Forest app which has the explicit intention of making sure you do not touch your screen for a set length of time and instead do something else off your phone.

I also “abuse” Pokémon Masters EX in a similar fashion. You’re expected to level up with some combination of putting them through battles that cost stamina to play through, and some pretty easy-to-obtain level-up items. And although there is an Auto option I have a feeling you are intended to manually do the battles in-game. Instead, I start story mode battles which cost no stamina to play through, that still reward me with XP no matter how many times I repeat it, and have the game fight the battle for me with the Auto setting. I check back when the battle is done and restart it. I have essentially turned this into an idle/incremental game, albeit one with a pretty short time between waiting and checking back in on the game. Free level-ups! Even though it does take much longer than the intended way, which is why I suspect nobody tried to prevent this method from working. I like doing this for some reason, and it’s probably the main reason I still keep this game downloaded despite my usual allergy to gacha games.

It was my favorite for artstyle/graphics, but I was not pleased when I tried to stir up drama by kissing a Sim’s partner in the same room. That would have gotten the partner racing over to slap someone, an argument, and a Furious status in The Sims 2. In The Sims 4, they just didn’t notice, no consequences.

I haven’t even pirated a movie in years. I just don’t have any more than a very mild “well if there’s literally nothing else to do because my arms are strapped to a chair for the next 2.5 hours, I guess I remember this one thing people said was good” (context: platelet donation, so yes this happens in real life and is not an insane hypothetical) interest in watching in the first place. Although I suppose that’s rare too ^^;

I do wish that Average Joe was more like the outraged Lemmy commenters though, to be honest. More change against bad practices would happen faster if he just voted with his wallet instead of grumbling a little online and continuing to do the same thing anyways with a non-necessary purchase that you can eliminate, where there are lots of other gaming alternatives for cheaper too. Not like food where if you are poor you kind of just have to buy cheapest and if that means patronizing Evil Company, well, you still have to eat. But I also sympathize with being a fan of Nintendo IPs, picking your battles, and maybe having other things you care about more than price hikes in video games specifically where you do vote with your wallet by refusing to purchase.

I admit I’m doing my best to not turn into “people who don’t boycott what I boycott are lazy apathetic sheeple who will not lift a finger to improve their conditions, people who boycott more things than me (especially things I like) are crazy crunchy party poopers who’d consign someone to Bad Person Land for not being 100% perfect and pure in every single purchasing habit” because I think I’m noticing that kind of thinking in myself, so I try to sympathize with both people who do more than me and people who do less.

They could release a game that just literally flips you the bird

The last triple A I bought was on a big sale because it’s long past its release date. Mostly ignoring modern ones, the only one I have wanted was BG3 which I am fully happy playing the many years waiting game for because I have so many other games to play first. c/patientgamers

Sorry you are being downvoted for your honest opinion. I’d understand if you had some nasty sentiment about people who find $80 too expensive in there, but you have no ill will or dim views of anyone expressed here… I’d like Lemmy to be a nice place and part of that includes not downvoting views that are unpopular but also not cruel towards anyone. Especially when the popular view is “I’m mad!” Dismissing everyone’s anger without trying to understand why they’re angry or where they are coming from isn’t the move, but this person isn’t doing that. The only “crime” they committed is not sharing in the anger themselves. And in a world full of algorithms pushing outrage, where lots of people on Lemmy came here to flee that very trend, I’d like non-anger to not be disapproved of.

I am honestly curious if them not jumping on the hatewagon and being personally okay with this is being interpreted as them saying “because I’m fine with $80 everyone else has to be too” or whatever. I want to know where the downvoters are coming from. Is it just simple “do not like their take! Downvote!”? Is it “since they are okay with this, they must be well-off and thus an out-of-touch bad person who deserves disapproval for being richer than me?” Is it some honest belief that this person is inadvertently advancing a harmful view to be complacent against ever-increasing prices and companies squeezing average people harder and harder?

I am not fine with the $80 increase, I just also see what seems to be an innocent take getting disapproval and I honestly want to know what they did wrong. Both so I can know for the future so I do not do it myself, and so if they didn’t actually do anything wrong there is something on record speaking up for “hey leave them alone.” Genuine question.

EDIT: Just realized. Is this a place where it is okay (or should be okay) to express dissent, or is this more like a case of entering c/racecarsarecool and posting about why you think racing is stupid? I can tell the latter is a dick move, but I am not sure if this is. It does involve going into a community whose views you can probably predict if you have been on Lemmy for a bit and telling them “yeah I don’t share your anger,” which could be likened to “hey c/knitting! Knitting is kind of boring actually,” but this doesn’t really come off as intentional pot-stirring bait or invading a community clearly intended for enthusiasts to be a hater to me.

I could argue the Ace Attorney series was that for me (played on Nintendo DS, am not purchasing the remakes), something along the lines of playing less than 50 hours for $60 and felt I got my money’s worth anyways. (Okay, the individual price of each game in the series was not $60, but adding them up altogether… I don’t remember their price or my exact playtime, it is entirely possible average playtime is longer and I just totally misremembered—didn’t exactly have playtime stats on the Nintendo DS—but you get the point. Costs more $ per hour of play compared to other games with more replayability.)

You could also argue I got lots more hours of enjoyment from it than those 50 hours of playtime though, because I also spent so many more hours reading free fanfiction and looking at free fanart and reading fan discussions online… I finally stopped hurling myself down the Ace Attorney rabbit hole maybe 2 years ago.

There have to be gamers who are consistent in this—there probably is that potential hypocrisy in some people (at least, “hypocrisy” from the outside, we’re not sure of their actual reasons) but there are also probably people who are consistent in their behavior. I can tell you I’ve never rented a movie ;)