He looks like Butt-head from Beavis and Butt-head

There are two groups of homebrewers: Those who have had to mop their ceiling, and those who will.

Ford has a vendetta against Toronto, that’s all.

The article is suggesting to make a debian-based distro

I would hope that the bill included language that restricted the sale to a vetted list of stables that will not immediately re-sell the horse to slaughter.

With local you’re limited in performance by the hardware you can buy, which is a huge up-front that most people would balk at. Hosted will give you as much performance as you could ever want billed by usage with several profit vectors built-in, but the customer sees smaller dollar number and better apparent performance and thinks they’re getting a deal. Car dealerships do the same thing with selling the monthly payment and not the actual sticker price.

The environmental difference then could be significant. Users taking the hosted route can choose to use much more resource-intensive models than a local PC could. They might see a $300 AI bill as a little pricey when it is usually $100, but figure that’s cheaper than buying a PC that could produce the same result, just at maybe half speed. This would result in a much higher energy cost from the hosted solution compared to the PC.

Problem is, the “good guys with guns” tend to leave their guns safely locked up at home, because being good guys they are responsible firearm owners.

It’s Doug Ford vs Toronto, he’s had a vendetta against the city ever since his addict brother died of ass cancer

The US has never shied away from being openly hypocritical though…

They’ll truss him up so it looks like he’s standing, guaranteed.

Artificial Super Stupidity, or ASS for short.

Yes and no? There’s a lot of chuds who listen to RATM and somehow don’t get their message; but they’re not necessarily listening to Tom Morello, and very likely may not even know his name (or Zack, or Tim, or Brad). The people who listen to RATM and know who Tom Morello is, are far more likely to understand the nuance here.

I’d say instead make an aisle and cart design for the store such that the store’s shopping carts would not be able to enter the self-checkout. Essentially, each shopper would be limited to what they can carry in a basket or two, with the added limitation that the checkout bagging area is only big enough for 2 baskets that cannot be removed once you start.

So exactly like the Titanic until it was too late to ignore.

That’s basically a Home Depot that also gives out construction plans for stuff…

voluntary resignation alternative

The term is “constructive dismissal.” Get them to put it in writing and either a) they’ll cave, or b) you got a case that most employment lawyers would take on contingency.

Most likely is they’d cave.

“Look at how bad it is right now!! That’s how bad it’ll be under SOCIALISM!!!”

The problem for them is that to make a Large Language Model, is it needs to consume a large amount of language. Meaning, to get even a semblance of basic functionality - literally putting together a grammatically correct sentence - means it will need to consume many orders of magnitude more language examples than their right-wing bullshit mill has ever produced. It could consume the entirety of Fox News’ catalogue and not reach even a fraction of what most LLM models have been trained on.

It’s currently impossible for an LLM to exist without having been trained on an absolute assload of progressive literature.

Appeasement is not peace.

I’ve done similar when designing/troubleshooting CSS - obnoxious colours, temporary heavy borders (potentially also obnoxious colours). Makes it much easier to see where your objects are specifically, z-index, unintentional overlaps and so on.