I mean, to be a lot more fair than you should be: Yeah he is a fucking idiot.

But sure, you could have done a metastudy to analyse multiple studies and notice a possible trend or pattern to alert you to possible dangers. That’s just a trend, and not verified, but at least something to base a hypothesis off of, which you would then test.

But if you’ve given yourself a deadline to make an announcement of what you’ve totally definitely learned, you likely go with the only thing that could possibly even maybe almost be true, pretend its totally real, because of course you’ve been doing your job and not sitting on your ass trying to point to being woke or gay or something more advantageous than smearing an american company but oops turns out doing that job takes someone who knows what the fuck they’re doing and turns out literally everything is extremely nuanced because there are shitloads of factors that lead to the development of the brain.

So you go on live tv, eat shit blaming what you’ve announced you’ll totally find the cause for on anything you could even pretend to think might be plausible…

then also blame it on genital mutilation?

Then maybe try and do a study on the hypothesis you had to run with.

Except you can’t particularly do an experiment to verify that ethically. But its fine, you don’t have ethics… except you’re running the NIH which DOES have ethical standards. So… damnit… now you have to find some way to do an “ethical” “study” that will test the hypothesis you came up with, except you’re still an idiot so you still can’t even begin to figure out how to do that.

Second, the wave in Britain (madness, specials, selector, bad manners, etc.)

Fair, I suppose I understand the idea but like… idk I can think of MANY reasons (patent bullshit, could be useful, or prove to be cheaper, or developed further into something better) why having something similar to an already existing process is still good. Look at Sodium batteries potentially now being 10% of the cost of lithium ones, even if they’re a similar but generally worse storage technology. I don’t think it should be a requirement that a new process or discovery have an inherent reason/advantage. Shit like that is how we end up with leaded gasoline.

sounds like saying “we already have a lung in our body why make an iron lung.”

Like I know obviously it’s not like plug this into your spine and cure paralysis but I could definitely be very useful.

I volunteer to lead the antifa poppy fields.

I like the idea that NPCs slowly learn this and just keep little treats to feed you like a stray cat to calm your ass down.

Don’t forget the $3 “governance” fee (not from the government), the $5 “line maintenance” fee, the $7 “I’m sure there was a reason for this one but we forgot” fee, and the $50 “fuck you we have a monopoly on this apartment what are you gonna do about it” fee.

Also a negative percent change from previous year is a wild thing to try and visualize as being bigger than the previous year but ok.

Appimage so it’ll run on bazzite/steamdeck as well is nice. Alpha and still says you may have to redo shit every update for now but, still nice.

Nah A+1+2+3=65+49+50+51 so the answer is 215.

That’s before blood coagulants evolved, from a quick Google search… so… maybe it was not particularly needed and they still did suck on blood just… slower.

Huh you know from a music perspective I know we can get a lot higher than 500hz but most speech is apparently around 1-300hz.

I… what? Fine since you can’t read anything with numbers less than 50% let me put it to you this way so MAYBE you understand.

Let’s assume you interact with 50 people a day(pretty low I interact with about 200 daily but I’m not gonna assume that’s normal), and let’s say 10 of those are probably friends family so we’ll ignore them. The probability of none of the other 40 being transphobic using your 31% would be (1-.31)^40=0.999999641 which is literally close enough to 100% to be considered a rounding error. Is that common enough for you?

I used Asian people as an example because it was a simple way to construe how low percents still are not rare because how many people we see daily. Using the same calculation there’d be a 91.5838% chance at least one person you see is Asian.

They said “everyone” accepts actors making a fake name, not specifically that everyone is transphobic.

Also, your study there ain’t doing that much to show its not common, as self-report/Social Desirability bias will skew that data but also saying they can live their life how they want doesn’t mean you’re not also transphobic… even ignoring that, at minimum 31% are? To say that isn’t common means you have to interact with fewer than 3 people daily, and that neither of those 2 happen to be transphobic. Sure if you stay at home and the only two people you see every day are the same two who have accepted you, congrats! Transphobia is cured! Otherwise… Yeah 1/3 people means it is EXTREMELY common. Like, to put it in perspective, Asians are like 6% of the population. Yet I wouldn’t exactly call seeing an Asian person “rare”.

You seem to be mistaking “majority” and “common”.

I suppose you could call your own actions something you are facing sure.

Not OP but… Huh, TIL. Would not have expected that.

Did you read the article? I guess I’ll explain more in depth so you don’t need to infer things.

The article is literally about profits bouncing back after the pandemic. literally saying they recovered in 2020-2024, what I was saying. Yes they compared it to data from 2005+, hence the bounce back part, instead of just saying went up from the last year. I did not think I needed to specify this because… it’s the literal title of the article?

We all knew profits were fine because Biden kept shoving how “good the economy is” down our throats when people were basically dying because they couldn’t afford shit. This was about profits being record highs and GDP being fine. Maybe not specifically about GEP, but I mean that follows from “record profits”. (After Covid and inflation, not saying from Covid itself. Many people complained about Biden’s economy because he kept praising himself for it while people couldn’t afford frozen chicken anymore. Really put a lot of voters off because it showed DNC only gives a shit about profit not people.)

And I was saying Trump is going to use this article (on how Biden’s economy bounced back) to say that Trump is doing a great job. (Where it was actively much worse in his first term and data does not include his second term.)

Pretty sure it’s in response to them using the theme song. Idk if Nintendo even owns the rights to that song outside of using it as the theme for their show though. Still people aren’t super happy with Nintendo going “we didn’t say they could use it but we are not taking it down like we would if it was a fan project.”

Yeah, we know, Biden wouldn’t shut up about how profit was totally good. Sure everyone was dying but fuck you; we only care about profit.

The timing also seems framed to praise Trump when it’s talking about 2020-2024z