Removing as a duplicate

No. It’s to provide legal protection for polluters

Most of the US isn’t paying attention to any news outlet which would cover this

There’s a reason the Trump regime put a $0 value on human lives lost to pollution

The study is for Europe, but in the US, the construction industry writes a model code and localities mostly just adopt it with fairly limited local changes

Not that anybody but billionaires will ever get paid

Each week the government said less about the findings of the board of inquiry which was to decide how the $5000 per person could be wangled. It became easier to answer malcontents with a cuff from a Minute Man than by repetitious statements from Washington.

Policy action books

I’m about to start The Carbon Wave

Apparently he made a religious film

Archived copy exists now

No. Archived copy exists now

There has been a big PR effort by the fossil fuels industry to blame arson, when that’s been responsible for a fraction of fires forever. What’s changed is the higher temperatures and lower humidity that goes with them, letting otherwise easily-contained fires grow rapidly. And that change is a result of burning fossil fuels.

California at the point where utility-scale batteries can power the state overnight a few days a year. If we are actually able to build offshore wind, and proceed with the planned battery build-out, it’s going to be most of the year. And the ecological armageddon isn’t happening.

The amount locked in is more like 2°C if we did a crash shift off fossil fuels and meat. Those higher numbers presuppose that people won’t forcibly shut down fossil fuel using plants and equipment before the end of its useful life.

They don’t show any indication that they’re going to listen to the judge.

They’re not yet at runaway. If we drop emissons to zero, then temperatures stabilize within a human lifetime

I don’t know or care what’s down in their heart or heart or innermost thoughts. It doesn’t really matter either. What matters is that they spend a huge amount of money promoting hate so that they will have a slightly lower tax rate

It’s not their first article on the topic.

Basically all the crazy computer security problems start affecting ballots. You really don’t want to do this if it can possibly be avoided. Particularly not in the US where you don’t have any kind of universal way to identify people online in any kind of reliable way.

You turn up. In person. You show the ability to interfere with political fundraising. You work to turn out voters on your side. You areange boycotts and other measures.

It’s on us.

Start asking local officials to arrange for volunteer ballot delivery and print-at-home