So what is your point then? That there isn’t high unemployment, and the Guardian just found a loser with a marketing degree?
Because it seems that your entire purpose in posting this article was to sneer at someone who you consider yourself above. If you don’t want calling out for being a condescending prick, don’t go out of your way to be a condescending prick.
Nope, it’s still just coming across as a Poundland-Farage diatribe, I’m afraid.
Perhaps if you have any friends in marketing they could give some of your posts a look over? Make your messaging clearer, and fix all the little errors while they’re at it?
I stand by what I said though. If you don’t see the merits in getting a first-class degree in and of itself, then it doesn’t surprise me that you jumped to assumptions despite all the information you needed being laid out in front of you.
I wouldn’t be shocked to find that you’re also the kind of person who also uses the phrase “Mickey Mouse Degree”.
I manage a software team. My degrees are both in computery stuff. The single best developer I’ve had on my team, however, had a degree in fine art.
Degrees are not simply about learning facts, they’re about learning analysis and evaluation, and then creating something with a degree of rigour far above A-level standard.
So back to your original question, there are tons of actual skills acquired on a marketing degree. The fact she got a first means that she’s really good at them too.
I assumed Lee is a male?
Hilarious.
Thanks 🙏
It works especially well because you come across as the sort of person who would look down on people making basic English mistakes.
I am not a native speaker - and your sarcasm completely missed the point, unless the point was to be a racist. 🙄
So what is your point then? That there isn’t high unemployment, and the Guardian just found a loser with a marketing degree?
Because it seems that your entire purpose in posting this article was to sneer at someone who you consider yourself above. If you don’t want calling out for being a condescending prick, don’t go out of your way to be a condescending prick.
Read again. Slowly.
Nope, it’s still just coming across as a Poundland-Farage diatribe, I’m afraid.
Perhaps if you have any friends in marketing they could give some of your posts a look over? Make your messaging clearer, and fix all the little errors while they’re at it?
If this is what you were able to understand, I cannot help you. I don’t think I have an ability to explain anything to someone of your ability.
Ah, so you completely stopped reading after the first few words? Makes sense.
Why don’t you kiss my arse, you patronising, sarcastic prick?
Touche.
I stand by what I said though. If you don’t see the merits in getting a first-class degree in and of itself, then it doesn’t surprise me that you jumped to assumptions despite all the information you needed being laid out in front of you.
I wouldn’t be shocked to find that you’re also the kind of person who also uses the phrase “Mickey Mouse Degree”.
I manage a software team. My degrees are both in computery stuff. The single best developer I’ve had on my team, however, had a degree in fine art.
Degrees are not simply about learning facts, they’re about learning analysis and evaluation, and then creating something with a degree of rigour far above A-level standard.
So back to your original question, there are tons of actual skills acquired on a marketing degree. The fact she got a first means that she’s really good at them too.
Me too - you can kiss my arse.
You stopped reading after the first few words again? Makes sense.
No, I only replied to the relevant part. Your defence of micky mouse degrees, while telling, was not really that relevant.
If you want to carry on kissing my arse, more tongue and less words next time please.