- cross-posted to:
- xkcd@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- xkcd@lemmy.world
Source: https://xkcd.com/3172/
More context: https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/3172:_Fifteen_Years
I’ve copied some of it below, but I didn’t go in and add all the links:
Randall’s then-fiancée (now wife) was diagnosed with cancer in late 2010. This is a matter he has discussed in the comic multiple times before, with Randall being depicted as Cueball and his wife as Megan. At this comic’s release, it had been 15 years since her diagnosis and treatments.
This comic continues previous comics in the series – 1141: Two Years, 1928: Seven Years, and 2386: Ten Years – the initial parts of which are shown in the first 20 panels, which are grayed-out. These take us through the initial diagnosis and inability to imagine what future might be, into concerns about it potentially recurring, and up to enjoying ten years of life together that they weren’t sure they would have.
After some new panels marking more significant non-cancer-related events from the most recent five years of their life, Megan announces some potentially concerning-sounding symptoms she’s experiencing. However, the punchline is that these are just the signs of growing old, which Cueball is experiencing too. This is good news, considering the serious medical scares they lived through.
The title text continues that ending with a play on a common conversation topic. Normally someone rhetorically asks “Want to feel old?” and then follows it with a description of a difference the conversants have with the younger generation, or how long it’s been since some significant event they both experienced, as Randall has done in several previous comics. This is meant to make the other person feel bad about their age. In this case, though, the question is taken literally, with a simple “Yes” response to indicate that feeling old is better than being dead and they are happy to be alive and to have had the time they have.
The finality of this new installment suggests that it may be the last in the series, as it is solely related to Randall’s wife’s recovery from cancer.
Congratulations to both of them. I’m glad they’ve had the money and connections to get the medical care they needed, and I hope they can pay it forward to others who need the same help.
I have genuinely conflicting feelings both for and against this kind of comment. Don’t have time to unpack them so I’ll just say it means there’s a fruitful discussion to be had and an online forum is a fine place to have it.
Not much against it though, I don’t see it as a criticism directed at Randall & family, but at a fucked up healthcare system that lets poor (and often not-rich-enough) people die.
I am also happy for this particular success story but I share the sentiment expressed in the previous comment.
It turns what should be a good, bittersweet moment into… resent, envy, and chiding.
And for what? Because so many cancer survivors campaign against cancer research and helping people with cancer? In my experience, they’re not exactly the pull up the ladder types.
No, that’s not it.
It would be it if @Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org would have said “I hate how they are able to afford the medical care they need, and I don’t”, which is exactly the opposite of what they said.
You can genuinely be happy for Randall Munroe’s wife, while still being critical that people need to be able to afford life-saving health care. That’s not a contradiction, and the original comment did exactly explore that.
And I’m pretty sure that if you ask Randall Munroe and his wife, they would have preferred to not pay for her treatment either, and I’d be very surprised if they’d be like “We were able to afford it, so we are good, and people who can’t afford it should just die, because they are bad”.
There’s no need to turn people against each other when the fault lies with a broken and corrupt system and with billionaires enriching themselves on the suffering of all the others while outright buying politicians for their cause.
Go fight for the health system you deserve instead.
If third world countries can have decent basic universal health systems, why is it so hard for you guys?
Jfc this is exactly why people run to the right, because so many people on the left can’t let anything be a nice moment without making sure everyone knows that they’re the most moral person in the room. We all already know the problems.
Stop virtue signalling. It’s transparent, annoying, and hurts the causes more than helps.
Have a look around this thread. There’s people right here who didn’t have the money and had relatives die.
It’s got nothing to do with virtue signalling when people are literally dieing because health care is too expensive for them.
And being offended by other people talking about dieing because of a failed system doesn’t make you anything but a smug asshole.
Not offended. Annoyed that on every thread here it devol es into politics and becomes a depressing place. I know the world is depressing and the everything is politics GM but goddamn I found this comic sweet, I followed xkcd through the cancer years, and someone saying “must be nice to have money” really feels disrespectful to them. Yeah, it probably did help, and yeah, our country sucks, but can we just have a nice comic for once that celebrates them making it through cancer? Why does every comment section on Lemmy have to have someone saying “Hey look! The system is fucked!”. I know it is! That’s why I was here trying to enjoy something for a few seconds!
Its not virtue signaling. People vent frustrations on the internet, welcome friend!
I remember a lot more of this kind of encouragement from churchgoers, and it was usually well-intentioned there too.