ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 2 months agoPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comexternal-linkmessage-square133linkfedilinkarrow-up1519arrow-down19file-textcross-posted to: privacy@programming.devworld@lemmy.worldnews@lemmy.world
arrow-up1510arrow-down1external-linkPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 2 months agomessage-square133linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: privacy@programming.devworld@lemmy.worldnews@lemmy.world
minus-squarefloquant@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up16·2 months agoThen why are the Epstein files being heavily redacted? Does the government have something to hide?
minus-squareImaginary_Stand4909@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoWell, this is the INDIAN Supreme Court, but I will certainly use that line when the US government decides to parrot “if you have nothing to hide”
Then why are the Epstein files being heavily redacted? Does the government have something to hide?
Well, this is the INDIAN Supreme Court, but I will certainly use that line when the US government decides to parrot “if you have nothing to hide”