If today was ten years ago, this article would be excellent science fiction. It’s long, and written by someone I’d like to punch in the head, but it’s gotta be read and I couldn’t stop.

Anyone who wants to debunk it, tell me it’s all wrong, I’d sure appreciate that so please do, because it reads like the end of everything.

This is different from every previous wave of automation, and I need you to understand why. AI isn’t replacing one specific skill. It’s a general substitute for cognitive work. It gets better at everything simultaneously. When factories automated, a displaced worker could retrain as an office worker. When the internet disrupted retail, workers moved into logistics or services. But AI doesn’t leave a convenient gap to move into. Whatever you retrain for, it’s improving at that too.

… Imagine it’s 2027. A new country appears overnight. 50 million citizens, every one smarter than any Nobel Prize winner who has ever lived. They think 10 to 100 times faster than any human. They never sleep. They can use the internet, control robots, direct experiments, and operate anything with a digital interface. What would a national security advisor say?

  • Doug Holland@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Whoops, my original comments above were written for my blog, where everyone knows I’m anti-AI, so yeah lemme state clearly, I don’t buy into the author’s subtext. It’s definitely more gee-whiz and “AI is thinking” than I’d endorse. To me the article is a report from behind enemy lines, telling me that even the enemy is starting to worry.