• spectre [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 month ago

    They usually go for “disorderly conduct” (you had a feeling about the situation at hand) or “obstruction of justice” (you didn’t let me do whatever I wanted) if they want to take someone away for bs reasons (even if the charges are dropped next week).

    Technically trespassing requires a verbal warning at which time you’re allowed to leave freely before they arrest you.

    • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 month ago

      Technically trespassing requires a verbal warning at which time you’re allowed to leave freely before they arrest you.

      Somebody must’ve said “Stop talking,” to the guy before they called the pigs in.

      • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        1 month ago

        In the end it doesn’t really matter whether or not they did it by the book. Contrary to what procedures-fetishist liberals believe, whether or not this is valid is either up to the politics of the judge or twelve of the most paranoid nimbys the prosecutor can suss out who will see the word “trespassing” and immediately vote to convict