The endless battle to banish the world’s most notorious stalker website::undefined

  • sab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No, the whole point is that an isp should not be forced to do anything, unless ordered to do so by a court.

    As the title mentions, this an endless chase if you approach it like this. Vigilante mobs aren’t going to solve this, it’s going to take specialist agencies with mandates to request data civilians can’t. Crimes are being committed there (not murders, but a good way to get the scare votes, I suppose), and there are laws in place to deal with that.

    As mentioned several times in this thread, shifting the responsibility for what is allowed to be said on the Internet from governments to corporate entities is a terrible precedent.


    Edit: Nevermind. I see you’re also responsible for this wonderful gem:

    The position is intellectually dishonest unless you’re actually pro-killing-transgender people.

    There’s no point in arguing with you.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Everyone here, including the EFF, has explicitly said the state should take action against people plotting to murder.

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sure. Court gets together says hey this content’s illegal, you backbone provider terminate their access. As long as there’s a court and due process I’m okay with it.

            Letting a corporation do an arbitrarily is the problem