Of course they did. If you’re rich, you get a bailout. If you’re not, then fuck you.

  • blackard@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There will always be opposition to policy from ‘the other side,’ even if it is reasonable policy. But as a holder of a mountain of federal student loan debt, interest rate elimination and low monthly payment caps are way more preferable to me than simply forgiving a percentage, claiming a political win, and calling it a day. It has been depressing to watch the debate be framed simply as “debt forgiveness” vs “you need to pay your debts, honor your commitments, why are we giving handouts to the elites!” with basically no other attention given to the actual mechanics of paying this debt. I don’t care if my debt is not forgiven, I’m not even asking for that. What I am NOT ok with, though, is how payments and interest are structured, as well as how poorly the non-profit forgiveness program has been run since its inception. Wanting this to have been the focus of policy and debated is not the same as “giving credence to their insanity.” And now, after three years, all we gained is a 5% reduction in IBR caps and a “we won’t send you to collections for a while” window. This wasn’t just a political failure because the Supreme Court is dysfunctional and practically the entire right wing is sadistic, it was also a failure because it was bad policy that a corporatist president didn’t actually care about in the first place.