reader [comrade/them]@hexbear.net to Chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 months agoIt appears that duckduckgo's crawler has mistaken taglines for the site's titlehexbear.netimagemessage-square19linkfedilinkarrow-up1149arrow-down10
arrow-up1149arrow-down1imageIt appears that duckduckgo's crawler has mistaken taglines for the site's titlehexbear.netreader [comrade/them]@hexbear.net to Chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square19linkfedilink
minus-squaremathemachristian [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·2 months agoAh yes the anti-fichtean so-called ‘dialectics’ which I’m sure most hexbears are familiar with
minus-squaretamagotchicowboy [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·2 months agoMy nuclear take is there’s no Marxism in the west since Marx turned Hegel on his head, we turn Fichte on his head and call it close enough.
minus-squaremathemachristian [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 months agoOk but for real how does this relate to tripartite graphs?
minus-squaretamagotchicowboy [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoIt was a graph with 3 parts. Synthesis, thesis, antithesis got put on a graph and this was the long rambling intro?
Ah yes the anti-fichtean so-called ‘dialectics’ which I’m sure most hexbears are familiar with
My nuclear take is there’s no Marxism in the west since Marx turned Hegel on his head, we turn Fichte on his head and call it close enough.
Ok but for real how does this relate to tripartite graphs?
loosley
It was a graph with 3 parts. Synthesis, thesis, antithesis got put on a graph and this was the long rambling intro?
Ahh thanks