Day by day I begin to wonder more and more if I can even call myself a communist anymore. Its becoming hard to really reconcile my faith with communism if the ideology itself is theorically opposed to it. Bukharin’s book, “ABCs of Communism,” has an entire section on Chapter 11 that directly talks about why religion and communism are incompatible. Communists believe history is driven by class struggle and material conditions. Religious people believe in stuff like divine intervention or divine will. A communist would probably look at islam (my faith) and be like “No prophet was sent a message by God and acted upon it, it was their material conditions that made them act.” I don’t see how one could believe both, it feels like its either or.

Sure, it is perfectly possible for religious people to largely agree with Marxists on such things as historical materialism and present-day class struggles, not to mention struggles for national liberation, against racism, etc. It is possible be anti-capitalist and fight for a classless, moneyless, and stateless society where MOP is colletively owned but at the end of the day, there is philosophical tension.

I feel at best, I can be an ally, but the way I see it, I will never be one of them. I do not belong. My voice does not count equally and my beliefs make me suspect. I have faced hostility from leftists that are atheist and hostile towards religion and been called a revisionist. If this is how me and others are gonna be treated just because of our faith, I’d rather die than simply be used as cannon fodder in a revolution.

  • fatur.new@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I can’t address whether or not you’re a radical centrist

    I’m sorry if I confused you, my communist friend. Radical centrist can be confusing because radical centrist is taught to be willing to use non-compromising solutions.

      • fatur.new@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago
        • when freedom of speech proves bring trouble (example: fascism) then radical centrist must be willing to put restriction on speech.
        • when private property proves not to bring prosperity and regulation (example: tax) alone proves insufficient to bring prosperity (example: tax avoidance) then radical centrist must be willing to nationalize.
        • when state feudalism proves insufficient (example: deregulation) then radical centrist must be willing to agree with socialist.