• pulsewidth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    3 days ago

    Red car was not watching the road at all - can see them hit the brakes just a frame before impact.

    Glad they hit a car and not a fucking pedestrian. Should lose their license.

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is part of why I stand behind a telephone/traffic pole when waiting at a corner. We literally have to hide from the car violence that surrounds us.

    • Poach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      3 days ago

      I hate to break out to you but most traffic poles and signs are designed to break away, so they won’t help protect you much. You’re post of the “clear zone” so idiots in cars don’t die when they hit things on the side of the road when they are not paying attention to driving. I guess pedestrians are included in that. Telephone poles, on the other hand are not designed to break away. (Obviously trees too)

  • slowbyrne@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    How much do you want to bet that a sedan or wagon or anything other than a truck/SUV would not have rolled in that crash.

    • Gonzako@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, but then the car makers profit margin would be 99% instead of 100%. Gotta sell us deregulated stuff so they can make big bucks

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      The sedan would’ve folded like a paper. The wagon would’ve liquefied the passengers inside. I hate cars and specially SUVs and trucks. But rolling to keep the passengers alive is not the problem with them. If passengers had a seatbelt on, they walked out of that tumble. It dispersed energy in a non deformable way. Sedans can be as survivable in the same scenario but the passengers would’ve been trapped inside a bubble of corrugated metal. Wagons are harder to survive. They are either too soft and crush the passengers, or are too stiff and transfer all the kinetic energy. Both kill the passengers.

      Fuck cars in general though. Trains rarely get t boned.

      • slowbyrne@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        From ConsumerReports in 2014

        A vehicle rollover is among the worst things that can happen to you on the road. Although rollovers occur in only about 3 percent of all serious crashes, they account for about 30 percent of people killed while riding in a passenger vehicle.

        Yes tech and safety systems have improved in 12 years, and in this case the suv’s passengers might have been fine, but I suspect rollover survival stats are still worse. That’s not even taking into account how rolling vehicles travel farther while rolling, putting other people at risk.

        That being said we’re only talking about rollovers here. Head-on collisions are a totally different story when you pit an SUV versus a regular sedan. But those results are more related to the differences in front crash zone height. And that’s only happening because car companies were allowed to categorize SUVs as “non-passenger work vehicles”, avoiding safety and emissions regulations. Here’s a great video taking about it from Climate Town

        • Kairos@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Is it? I’ll believe that red light cameras help when shown that it does.

          In the meantime we can do things that actually make intersections safer like raising them/traffic calming.

    • Beetschnapps@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Almost like they’re not connected. Almost like a camera invading people’s privacy is separate from someone running a red light.

      Can you tell the difference? Can you understand a camera on your ass isn’t the same as someone recklessly breaking the law?

  • trepli@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    The craziest for me is when the kid steps out: you may be distracted when you are alone (still no excuse) but at least focus when someone you care about is with you. Especially considering that there were other cars waiting at the red light

  • tyrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    The bystanders just go around? No one jumps out to check on everyone?!

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Oh, I assumed from driving through a red at speed, and then immediately bursting into fire. I should have noticed people managed to get out before burning to death.

        • infinitevalence@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          https://recharged.com/articles/ev-fire-risk-statistics-vs-gas-car/

          Across recent 2023–2025 analyses, battery-electric vehicles see roughly 25 fires per 100,000 vehicles, while gasoline cars average around 1,500 fires per 100,000 vehicles. That’s roughly 60 times fewer fires for EVs.

          chances of bursting into flames in an ICE car are much higher, but reporting on that would not collect eyeballs so EV headlines are what we end up reading. Capitalism bias.

        • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          That smoke is from the chemical reaction that deploys the air bags (Which likely just denied a few people a Darwin award). That said it’s also really awful to breath in, and the engine is likely still a fire risk.