RmDebArc_5@piefed.zip to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 day agoAnon is a centristmedia.piefed.zipimagemessage-square109linkfedilinkarrow-up1528arrow-down19
arrow-up1519arrow-down1imageAnon is a centristmedia.piefed.zipRmDebArc_5@piefed.zip to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square109linkfedilink
minus-squareNonconfrontational@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·12 hours agoNot really, as we can dramatically increase iq with wealth.
minus-squarenanometer1625@thelemmy.clublinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 hours agoIf true, then it would provide a way to redistribute wealth and measure the collective impact on IQ in a quantitative way, which would indeed make it a useful statistic
minus-squareNonconfrontational@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 hours agoLet me know when we do wealth redistribution, lol.
minus-squarechortle_tortle@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·9 hours agoThese are not mutually exclusive statements. For example I exfoliate with nickles because money reduces dumb dumb.
Not really, as we can dramatically increase iq with wealth.
If true, then it would provide a way to redistribute wealth and measure the collective impact on IQ in a quantitative way, which would indeed make it a useful statistic
Let me know when we do wealth redistribution, lol.
These are not mutually exclusive statements.
For example I exfoliate with nickles because money reduces dumb dumb.