More specific would be “historical polygamy from Biblical times.” Like, “kings and stuff did it back then.”
Anybody who thinks that means the Bible is for this need only look at the actual Biblical accounts of the many kings therein: Occasionally wise, fatally flawed, ultimately lonely and empty despite having the world of men in their hand.
It is not the role of man, to rule over other men (or women).
More specific would be “historical polygamy from Biblical times.” Like, “kings and stuff did it back then.”
Anybody who thinks that means the Bible is for this need only look at the actual Biblical accounts of the many kings therein: Occasionally wise, fatally flawed, ultimately lonely and empty despite having the world of men in their hand.
It is not the role of man, to rule over other men (or women).
man I wish we could all just leave the abrahamic fanfic fights behind the species.