• FaeDrifter@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I kinda agree with you but don’t.

    Capitalism is about maximizing profit.

    Which isn’t technically the same as “turning people into addicts”.

    But maximizing profit is mathematically about maximizing sales and profit margins. Which is most powerful when maximizing demand or desire. The most potent form of demand is addiction.

    So addiction isn’t necessary a design purpose of capitalism, but it’s emergent.

    And it’s not new, it dates back to the 1700’s: https://www.etymonline.com/word/addiction

    Government regulations combat capitalism exploiting addiction with varying success in verying industries over the last several hundred years.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think we fully agree. I mean there were things like trading companies selling opium to villagers as well to reference a historical example.

      I just think what he’s calling limbic capitalism is way more prevalent in the range of sources it comes from and who the targets are.

      I think summarily what’s changed is that in centuries past people didn’t gather round a conference table with an understanding of human psychology and nuero science and ask each other, “how can we get 5 year olds addicted to our iPhone game?”. And while it’s likely a slight exaggeration to say they’re literally doing that now…I don’t think it’s very far off.