As I’ve mentioned before, we now live in a world where creative people have to prove they created the thing they created.
Sit with that for a second, because …
“I built GitHub for words” is a thing a person would say if they didn’t know what git is.
Also, this whole site is slop.
The dream — the actual dream — is that when you submit something and somebody squints and says “this feels like AI,” you can hand them a timelapse of yourself writing it. Not a vibe. A record. Receipts.
Ehhh, I’d say their argument does make sense. Lines are not a very accurate representation of how well developed a piece of writing is. Because of how paragraphs work, one chapter of a book could be a few dozen lines, even if it has a few thousand words.
Their use of ai in this anti ai project however is a shit show
“I built GitHub for words” is a thing a person would say if they didn’t know what
gitis.Also, this whole site is slop.
Fuck off.
Ehhh, I’d say their argument does make sense. Lines are not a very accurate representation of how well developed a piece of writing is. Because of how paragraphs work, one chapter of a book could be a few dozen lines, even if it has a few thousand words.
Their use of ai in this anti ai project however is a shit show
githas a variety of options for dealing with this type of content, eg.git diff --word-diffInteresting! I did not know about this!
Really ironic, what were they thinking?