Here’s a beautiful woodpecker showing off what it caught this month. I do like getting ethereal style to my work.

  • TIEPilot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    They are hard enough to find/see in the wild, to find one and get a great picture is insane :)

    • MLVisionnaire@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 days ago

      For this one, according to history starting from after default orientation:

      1. Tone Curve (XYZ)
      2. Crop
      3. Profiled Denoise
      4. Color Contrast
      5. Local Contrast

      The camera itself is Canon EOS R7. 200-800 mm Canon Lens. It’s a bit of a noise monster though.

      • postnataldrip@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        I use an R7 too and have been shooting a lot of night sports. 8-12k ISO to get a fast enough shutter and yeah, unsurprisingly noisy af.

        Not sure what you’re processing with but Dxo Photolab cleans them up amazingly well, I found it noticeably better than LR. You need to shoot in Raw for the good NR stuff, but for me personally I do that anyway for the flexibility to adjust some of the settings I inevitably got wrong in the moment. I have zero affiliation with them beyond being happy with the product.

        • MLVisionnaire@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          I’m processing using RAW, and Darktable. I try to keep my ISO low as 1250, but will go up when necessary. I use manual.

          • postnataldrip@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Not a critique of the pic you’ve posted (which is gorgeous btw), just mentioning as you’ve called out the noisiness that comes with high-res crop sensors, and sharing what worked for me.

            I really like Darktable, but if you have a Mac or Windows machine (or check if they’ll work with Wine, I didn’t try as I needed to get a mainstream OS for unrelated reasons), it’s definitely worth giving the paid options a go, use the free trials. The first time I tried on a pic taken at night on a fast shutter at 5-digit ISO I was astonished.

            This one’s only at 2500 ISO, but here’s a sample 1:1 crop with just optical corrections:

            In Darktable, with the default workflow followed by profiled denoise (which incidentally creates a 67MB intermediate DNG, the CR3 is 45MB):

            And denoised in Photolab on default settings:

            • MLVisionnaire@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 days ago

              The result certainly looks better. I’ll use something else for the denoising. I actually do use Winblows here though.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        Ha! I am vindicated with the lower pixel count and thus fatter pixels on my R10.

        …That’s my story, and I’m sticking to it.

        (And it was totally not because I was too skint to afford an R7, or an R6 Mk2, or pinch-me-I’m-dreaming, an R5. No siree.)