• dedale@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Change is hard. In Europe we wanted to drop daylight saving time, but nobody could agree on which hour to keep. So it’s here to stay. Sigh.

    • desttinghim@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fahrenheit’s 0 is the freezing point of water - salt water that is. Not that I think it’s better, just that there was some thought put into it.

      • Creat@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is no freezing point of salt water. Cause water can have a very small or very large amount of salt in it. There isn’t even a “default” amount of salt that’s just assumed.

      • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It… isn’t. That would change wildly depending on which sea/ocean you get your saltwater from (more salt = colder freezing point).

        It really is defined relative to a very specific brine mixture (in the most scientifically generous origin story - some say he literally just measured the coldest winter day he could). Well except it isn’t anyway, because like all US units nowadays it’s defined against metric units (namely the Kelvin, just like 0°C is actually defined to be 273.15 K).

  • Cisop Sixpence@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I live in the United States and although I grew up here using Fahrenheit, I switched to Celsius almost 10 years ago. Part of my reason for switching was the rest of the world was using Celsius and every time they would mention the temperature, I had no clue if that was very hot, or just right and kept having to convert, so since there were not that many countries that used Fahrenheit, I switched. I still know what the comfortable range is in Fahrenheit, but now I also know in Celsius as I use it every day. Also, I no longer appear to be an old curmudgeon that is resistant to using a system the rest of the world already uses.

  • roulettebreaker@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I had once heard described that fahrenheit’s best feature is that you can go “oh, 1-100, ‘sheesh, that’s really cold!’ to ‘hoof, that’s pretty hot!’” and yeah, while I was in the US where most temperatures (RIP Florida) change all the time, that sure was convenient.

    However, living in a country that always stays in the 80-100 range, the ‘oh fuck, the water’s freezingto 'oh fuck, the heat death of the sun is upon us’ range is a MUCH more useful scale to knowing if we’ve been struck by some sort of apocalyptic event today

  • moneygrowsontrees@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like to refer to them as Freedom units and Communist units (in jest, obviously). I will say, though, that Fahrenheit feels like a more precise scale for measuring temperature even if the units are goofy.

    • kilmister@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      What additional arguments besides personal experience would you give to back this precision claim?

      Temperature scales are arbitrary by nature, and the criteria behind their definition can be useful or not. Fahrenheit’s isn’t that much useful compared to Celsius’ or Kelvin’s.

      • moneygrowsontrees@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not arguing on Fahrenheit’s behalf or saying it IS more precise. I just said it “feels” more precise because you have finer increments in whole numbers. 70 degrees F is about 21 degrees C while 90 degrees F is about 32 degrees. 20 degrees of increment in F versus 12 in C which feels more precise. It’s the same way metric length measurements feel more precise because there are whole number millimeters rather than fractional inches.

        I have no strong opinion any one way, other than I feel like everyone should endeavor to be comfortable converting between various systems of measurement.

        • Virkkunen@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can simply use as many decimals you want to make Celsius more precise. You don’t see it used in general because it really isn’t needed.

          • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The little digital thermometers I have around the house read to one decimal place. The precision argument is just bizarre.

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    F is kinda nice for weather as a scale of 1 to 100 of really cold feeling to really hot feeling. But for anything scientific or calibration related, C is great

    • kat@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Disagree. Celsius is super helpful for determining if it’s gonna snow or not, a key weather thing where I live. Humid and cold and below 0? Snow. Humid and cold and above 0? Rain or freezing rain.

      Also helps with plants. Below 0? Frost.

      I’d argue you can’t get more intuitive than 0 is cold, below 0 is very cold. Celsius also plays nice with round numbers, every 5 or 10 degrees is a change in feeling. 0 is cold, 5 out is cooler, 10 out is cool, 15 is moderate, 20 is comfortable, 25 is room and warm, 30 is hot, 35+ is very hot. Every ten degrees we’re doing big changes. 0 is frozen, 10 is cool, 20 is comfortable, 30 is hot. 32 being frozen doesn’t feel as intuitive.

      • dominoko@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The range for livable temperatures follows a more reasonable scale. Hot is really high numbers. Cold is low. The exact temperature is more precise because the range is larger.
        Celsius is fine for scientists but for the regular person Fahrenheit has a better range.
        Also I’m biased.

  • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fahrenheit is better for weather, and I’ll fight anyone about it.

    We use Celsius in the lab because it makes math easier, it’s great.

    But Fahrenheit is basically a 0-100 scale of how hot it is outside and that makes perfect sense for describing outside conditions relative to human sensory perception.

    • Ddhuud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fahrenheit is better for weather

      You’re just used to it. The rest of the world have 0 problems using it for weather.