☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml to Shit Reactionaries Say@lemmygrad.mlEnglish · 10 months agoI present you some of the best liberal brainrot lemmy has on offerlemmygrad.mlexternal-linkmessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up164arrow-down12
arrow-up162arrow-down1external-linkI present you some of the best liberal brainrot lemmy has on offerlemmygrad.ml☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml to Shit Reactionaries Say@lemmygrad.mlEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square51fedilink
minus-squaresupersolid_snake@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up35arrow-down1·edit-210 months agoThe hubble telescope hasn’t traveled the distance between what libs believe and reality.
minus-squareShrike502@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up23arrow-down1·10 months agoHubble stays in orbit, doesn’t it? Wouldn’t Voyager be a better fit?
minus-squaresupersolid_snake@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up24·10 months agoMy bad, I actually confused Hubble and voyager somehow. Thanks for the correction.
minus-squareMagos_Galactose@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up14·edit-210 months agoIt “stays” in orbit, yes, but to do so, it has to move at around 27,000 kph in orbit. The comment said “distance”, not “displacement”, so it’s still a lot. [No, I’m not doing the math.]
minus-squareDanComrd [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·10 months agoI want this quote on a shirt
The hubble telescope hasn’t traveled the distance between what libs believe and reality.
Hubble stays in orbit, doesn’t it? Wouldn’t Voyager be a better fit?
My bad, I actually confused Hubble and voyager somehow. Thanks for the correction.
It “stays” in orbit, yes, but to do so, it has to move at around 27,000 kph in orbit. The comment said “distance”, not “displacement”, so it’s still a lot.
[No, I’m not doing the math.]
I want this quote on a shirt![emoji michael-laugh michael-laugh](https://www.hexbear.net/pictrs/image/3858ea0f-f09c-4c6f-95a1-5dda154612ad.png)