Let’s pretend the shooting was valid. You are allowed to use reasonable force to stop a threat. That doesn’t mean death, death may happen but the force has to stop once the aggressor is no longer a threat.
Does anyone think 51 shots are reasonable?
deleted by creator
Public execution happens anytime a cop gets shot
Egh. If, in theory, I’m firing and I think there is a danger there 6 bullets ain’t really excessive. I’m not saying these idiots were justified but there were eight cops.
If it was a valid shooting, then the number of shots is irrelevant.
8 officers and 51 shots is ~6 rounds per officer. That’s not completely insane if you take into account how quickly someone can fire 6 rounds and addrenalin/the situation.
That’s literally 2-3 seconds.
I’m not defending the cops one way or the other, but again, if we are stipulating that it’s a “good shoot”, then number of shots doesn’t matter but even if it did, 51 rounds from 8 officers might be in the realm of reasonable (obviously depends on how you define reasonable).
Sorry it is relevant.
The academy stresses you are only authorized to use deadly force to stop a threat. You are not authorized under law to kill anyone.
It’s why we were trained to figure two rounds then evaluate if there was still a threat.
We were never trained to figure six rounds in a panic because that isn’t stopping a threat. Thats trying to kill someone.
In court cases you’ll see them evaluate each shot for that reason. I’m all for giving cops reasonable doubt but 51 shots is insane.
16 I could see. 51 is just stupid.
Two shots, then reassess — that makes sense to me.
Come the adrenaline and it’s just squeeze the trigger til nothing happens any more.
What doesn’t make sense to me is shooting this guy. Maybe it’ll make sense if/when we’re allowed to see what happened. That happens, sometimes.
Not often, but sometimes.
When you just magically drop. You lose aim and might start shooting bystanders. Also you’re wasting ammo.
In my academy, it was heavily stressed two rounds, evaluate, two rounds.
People have the impression can’t are allowed to kill. It’s semantics but they’re not. It’s enough force to stop the threat.
Now if the guy had a machine gun and was shootings hundreds of rounds. You can justify 51 shots.
I’m tired of cops shootings 50+ rounds as that is just murder In my eyes.
The only time we were taught to “kill” was active shooter drills. That’s it. The only time the word kill was used was during active shooter drills.
deleted by creator
It’s not a split second decision when they already plan on killing the person.
How long does it take to fire those many shots? It wouldn’t be “mere seconds”, would it?
8 cops all shooting at once would only need to fire 7 times and that even has a few misses. That could actually be done insanely quickly.
With that said, I don’t think we need to play “devil’s advocate” to justify this situation at all and I think it’s highly inappropriate. Either the cops are highly trained professionals or they’re scared idiots. If the police with all their ‘training’ can react like scared idiots then at least the same level of leeway should be given to the people they constantly assault.
You could get 6 shots off easy in a few seconds.
Our review of public records of firearms discharges by police indicates that it is common for 50% or more of all shooting incidents to involve an officer shooting a dog.
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/police-kill-dogs-alarming-rate-170111652.html
these canine murders have become so common that the Department of Justice has dubbed the phenomenon “an epidemic.” The DOJ estimates that cops kill 25 to 30 dogs every day, meaning that as many as 10,000 dogs die at the hands of police annually.
Therefore, by their own logic, shooting cops is justified. They shoot dogs like it’s their job, and they regularly brandish weapons at people.
America has a gun problem.
Fuck any fucker who shoots a dog.
Fuck any fucker that weaponizes animals to enact state violence upon innocent citizens.
