Doug Holland@lemmy.world to THE POLICE PROBLEM@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoMan in mental health crisis shot police dog that was biting him, so eight Utah cops firing 51 shots to kill him were 'justified'gephardtdaily.comexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1147arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up1143arrow-down1external-linkMan in mental health crisis shot police dog that was biting him, so eight Utah cops firing 51 shots to kill him were 'justified'gephardtdaily.comDoug Holland@lemmy.world to THE POLICE PROBLEM@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square14fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareNeuromancer@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoSorry it is relevant. The academy stresses you are only authorized to use deadly force to stop a threat. You are not authorized under law to kill anyone. It’s why we were trained to figure two rounds then evaluate if there was still a threat. We were never trained to figure six rounds in a panic because that isn’t stopping a threat. Thats trying to kill someone. In court cases you’ll see them evaluate each shot for that reason. I’m all for giving cops reasonable doubt but 51 shots is insane. 16 I could see. 51 is just stupid.
minus-squareDoug Holland@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·1 year agoTwo shots, then reassess — that makes sense to me. Come the adrenaline and it’s just squeeze the trigger til nothing happens any more. What doesn’t make sense to me is shooting this guy. Maybe it’ll make sense if/when we’re allowed to see what happened. That happens, sometimes. Not often, but sometimes.
minus-squareNeuromancer@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoWhen you just magically drop. You lose aim and might start shooting bystanders. Also you’re wasting ammo. In my academy, it was heavily stressed two rounds, evaluate, two rounds. People have the impression can’t are allowed to kill. It’s semantics but they’re not. It’s enough force to stop the threat. Now if the guy had a machine gun and was shootings hundreds of rounds. You can justify 51 shots. I’m tired of cops shootings 50+ rounds as that is just murder In my eyes. The only time we were taught to “kill” was active shooter drills. That’s it. The only time the word kill was used was during active shooter drills.
Sorry it is relevant.
The academy stresses you are only authorized to use deadly force to stop a threat. You are not authorized under law to kill anyone.
It’s why we were trained to figure two rounds then evaluate if there was still a threat.
We were never trained to figure six rounds in a panic because that isn’t stopping a threat. Thats trying to kill someone.
In court cases you’ll see them evaluate each shot for that reason. I’m all for giving cops reasonable doubt but 51 shots is insane.
16 I could see. 51 is just stupid.
Two shots, then reassess — that makes sense to me.
Come the adrenaline and it’s just squeeze the trigger til nothing happens any more.
What doesn’t make sense to me is shooting this guy. Maybe it’ll make sense if/when we’re allowed to see what happened. That happens, sometimes.
Not often, but sometimes.
When you just magically drop. You lose aim and might start shooting bystanders. Also you’re wasting ammo.
In my academy, it was heavily stressed two rounds, evaluate, two rounds.
People have the impression can’t are allowed to kill. It’s semantics but they’re not. It’s enough force to stop the threat.
Now if the guy had a machine gun and was shootings hundreds of rounds. You can justify 51 shots.
I’m tired of cops shootings 50+ rounds as that is just murder In my eyes.
The only time we were taught to “kill” was active shooter drills. That’s it. The only time the word kill was used was during active shooter drills.