Largest Farm to Grow Crops Under Solar Panels Proves To Be A Bumper Crop For Agrivoltaic Land Use::undefined

  • Uranium 🟩@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is one that seriously gets me as to why we don’t do this more, it would make so much sense. Obvious benefits are power generation, but also when you consider, it would significantly reduce how scorching hot large carparks get in the sun, depending on the style of the solar canopy being built it could also massively reduce the amount of water flow onto the ground reducing some wear on the tarmac in addition to some hazards.

    Also for places like the UK where we typically don’t have huge amounts/extended periods of snow, as long as the canopy is sufficiently designed for the additional weight, you could ameliorate the need to salt the car parks, once again increasing the life of the tarmac.

    It would also keep people’s cars much cooler, in the sun, and make things generally a lot cooler below the canopy.

    • SpaceBar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Its too hard to maintain.”

      “What if someone hits the pole holding up the panels?”

      “It costs more than clear cutting a forest to put the panels in.” (True story)

      Lots of bullshit reason.

      • acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s where a properly functioning government would be able to step in. Parking lot taxes are going up x%, but if you install solar panels, you get an x% tax break.

        That and add a steep tax for single purpose solar fields.

      • Asifall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not that it’s too hard to maintain, but that in order to make sense it would have to be cheaper than building and maintaining the solar panels on some larger and less valuable patch of land 30 minutes out of town.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are very few land uses more worthless than a surface parking lot.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I work in municipal development.

      If it costs a quarter-penny more to build a better product, a developer will do anything they can to avoid it.

      I’ve had them flip out and demand to the City Manager that I be fired because they had to paint parking stripes. More than once.