• mateomaui@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Well it’s a good thing that reality doesn’t revolve around your opinion.

      edit: I mean, let’s see here, how many credible people can I think of on Lemmy?

      Not a single one, because we’re all anonymous random people. The only shred of credibility here is sharing something a fairly well validated website or news source… exactly like on Twitter. You act like no one on here posts questionable things that get removed. That is selective delusion for you.

      • AssPennies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        how many credible people can I think of on Lemmy?

        Nobody’s arguing there are credible people here on lemmy, that’s a strawman you’ve set up.

        • mateomaui@reddthat.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          False. The implication is that information shared by people not on Twitter, such as here, is more credible than information shared by someone on Twitter.

          Try harder, you idiots are boring.

          edit:

          Also, the stupidity of the assertion that no one on Twitter has credibility is enhanced by the raw fact that possibly every single person who writes the articles that are shared here on Lemmy from sources deemed trustworthy by some percentage of you also happen to have Twitter accounts. At some point, it becomes an inherently ignorant argument.