While Elon’s then-partner Grimes was recording her part in the game as cyborg popstar Lizzy Wizzy, the erratic tech billionaire turned up with an antique firearm to “insist” on being included in the game. “The studio guys were like sweating,” Grimes is quoted as saying. Musk adds “I told them that I was armed but not dangerous”.

Apparently, the developers relented at the time, though it’s unclear if Musk did actually get the cameo in the end.

  • Chozo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Elon is literally everything Cyberpunk warns is about. He’s the biggest corpocunt the world has ever seen. Arasaka is exactly what Elon wants X Corp to be. He’s actually trying to make chips that get implanted into your brain. He wants his own Relic. He wants to be the immortal Saburo Arasaka.

    The lack of self awareness is astounding.

  • frog 🐸@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    So… basically, Musk turned up at a studio and threatened the devs with a gun (which antique or not, could have been loaded and functional - shooting with antique guns is a thing) to make them put him in the game?

    I know there’s a massive cultural difference around guns between the UK and the US, but I’m genuinely struggling to see how “a man has turned up to our studio with a gun because he wants us to put him in our game” doesn’t warrant a call to the police.

    • VegaLyrae@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      US gun owner here:

      It 100% warrants a call to the police.

      Sounds like assault with a deadly weapon, and if he took it out to show, then it’s brandishing. It doesn’t matter if it was non-firming because the target didn’t know that, and typically these laws are written to be what “a reasonable person would believe”.

      Also, at the time this happened he was a known user of Marijuana and thus not eligible to own a firearm, as that rule had not yet been struck down.

  • gaael@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Off-topic below.

    Btw, I saw some posters here still use the slur “cunt”.

    It’s my understanding that depending on which country you’re from (eg Australia or UK) this slur might not carry a sexist connotation in the mainstream culture, so I don’t think any of you used it with the intent of being sexist.

    Nevertheless, in the feminist circles I belong to, uskng a word that describes the genitalia of AFAB as a slur carries a sexist charge whether it was the intent or not. So we try to create new slur reflexes for ourselves and tend to use other words that do not carry an offensive charge towards a discriminated category.

    Please do not take this as a personal attack or an attempt to tell you how to speak, I just think we can do better as a community if everyone spots the stuff they are the more sensitive to and explains to the others why they see a problem.

    On-topic. Elon, please get lost in outer space in one of your stupid rockets.

    • Squirrel@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So, serious question: why is “dick” okay and “cunt” is not? The former is much more common than the latter, both as an insult and (especially) as a reference to genitalia. While “cunt” is generally seen (in the US) as a more severely insulting word, it’s also rarely used in reference to genitalia (in my experience as a cis male).

    • arefx@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No more using the word dick either guys! Oh wait while we’re on it no more saying anything offensive guys, G rated at all times wouldn’t want to accidentally offend anyone.

      • bermuda@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh wait while we’re on it no more saying anything offensive guy

        you are on beehaw, so yes you probably should try not to offend people.

        • jcarax@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          My major problem is that our culture and history are interwoven with language. An attack on offensive language could very well, maybe unintentionally, disconnect us further from our culture and history. Not all of that history and culture is great, but even then, we need to stay connected so that we can continue to learn from it for as many generations as possible.

          We live in a world where we’ve been trading in culture for convenience. Now we have some burning books and attacking change. On the other side, we have others who are attacking anything remotely offensive to them, attempting to banish it. The casualty of this war will be the little we have left of our cultural traditions.

            • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If the word is used regularly in British and Australian language, it’s cultural imperialism for Americans to ask us to stop using it because they’ve decided it’s offensive.

            • jcarax@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t really know, to be honest. But the way culture and language are intertwined, and how unnerving it is for people to be asked to adjust their lexicon, it concerns the heck out of me. Not book banning and burning levels of concerned, but in the same direction.

              • Vodulas [they/them]@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                I dunno, I think we gain a better understanding of culture and history when we take a look at these words, their history and why they are hurtful, and decide to stop using them. Once you see things from the point of view of the people that have been called these things, it opens you up to be more empathetic.

                • jcarax@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Oh trust me, I’ve been called plenty of things, and have hurt for a great deal of my life as a result. I’ve also said awful things, and hurt even more for that.

                  I just think that separating people from parts of their language is more akin to a cultural lobotomy than anything else. Taking aspects of language from someone who does not truly understand why, will surely be jarring, and lead to negative reactions more often than not. I don’t think this is going to have a long term positive effect, unless we take the slow road of working to understand each other, and truly embrace all diversity. If we condemn those who hurt us, it only acts to drive more of a wedge through our society.

                  Telling someone that their actions which are fundamental to their being are hurtful to you, and they need to change, is in fact hurtful to them. It’s not their fault how they were raised, and how their experiences have shaped them, no matter how horrible someone might be. But if we embrace the diversity they add to society, and support them where we can, they just might come to see it for themselves, and strive to be better.

                  Only the individual can decide to change themself for the better. And even then, it’s a life long journey, and often only minimal changes are possible. So, we should be celebrating the efforts they put forth, not condemning them for the things they don’t have the capacity to change.

    • gaael@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Off-topic only, has nothing to do with the content related to CP2077 and the muskrat

      So, based on some comments here, it looks like I came across as trying to ban language, to forbid words, to restrict your free speech.

      As stated in my original post, this was and still is not my intention. I have not attacked personally the persones using “cunt”, nor have I said no one should say that.

      I just shared a reflexion, because that’s why I sign up on social media platforms.

      I am happy that some people felt safe enough in this community to explain why they think my views are incorrect, I actually learned some things thanks to you.

      I’m not trying to ban the “cunt” word from language - and if I was, it would be so laughable to think I could have that kind of influence.

      I just believe that the words we use have an effect on people. And I think it’s worth it to sometimes pause and wonder which words we are using and if we can use better ones.

      I’m not going to engage further on this topic in this channel, it’s probably not the most appropriate space.