☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml to GenZedong@lemmygrad.mlEnglish · edit-21 year agoNazipedia gotta whitewash quicklemmygrad.mlimagemessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up124arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up124arrow-down1imageNazipedia gotta whitewash quicklemmygrad.ml☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml to GenZedong@lemmygrad.mlEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square56fedilinkfile-text
archived link https://web.archive.org/web/20230928010556/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yaroslav_Hunka
minus-squareSerdan@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agohttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Yaroslav_Hunka The general sentiment seems to be heavily in favor of either keeping the article as is, or rewriting it to be about the event. It’s interesting how Wikipedia is accused of bias from all sides, by people who can’t be bothered to figure out how it works.
minus-squareTheLepidopterists [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoSo there’s not an article about the event yet?
minus-squareTWeaK@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 year agoNo. Because, for whatever reason, the person who first decided to write an article chose to write it about the person instead of the event. You could write an article yourself if you wanted.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Yaroslav_Hunka
The general sentiment seems to be heavily in favor of either keeping the article as is, or rewriting it to be about the event.
It’s interesting how Wikipedia is accused of bias from all sides, by people who can’t be bothered to figure out how it works.
So there’s not an article about the event yet?
No. Because, for whatever reason, the person who first decided to write an article chose to write it about the person instead of the event.
You could write an article yourself if you wanted.