Calanthesrose@lemmy.world to Dating@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agoWhat is this instance for?message-squaremessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up15arrow-down1message-squareWhat is this instance for?Calanthesrose@lemmy.world to Dating@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square7fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareJackLSauce@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·1 year agoPointless guess: YYYY-MM-DD vs DD-MM-YYYY vs Unix timestamp
minus-squareCalanthesrose@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoFirmly in the DD-MM-YYYY camp despite my upbringing of MM-DD-YYYY.
minus-squareR51@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoThen you’re a primate. You have got to be trolling. YYYY-MM-DD is the only rational way to write it.
minus-squareCalanthesrose@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoThat probably would be less confusing.
minus-squareRednax@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoAlong with a 24 hour clock. But that might fall outside the scope of this community.
Pointless guess: YYYY-MM-DD vs DD-MM-YYYY vs Unix timestamp
Firmly in the DD-MM-YYYY camp despite my upbringing of MM-DD-YYYY.
Then you’re a primate. You have got to be trolling. YYYY-MM-DD is the only rational way to write it.
That probably would be less confusing.
Along with a 24 hour clock. But that might fall outside the scope of this community.