• Psythik@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t know how old you are, but I feel like younger people say this more often than older people.

    As someone who saw the transition from 8-bit to 16-bit to 32/64-bit in their childhood, graphics were everything from the 80s until at least the 2000s. Each new generation was leaps and bounds better than the last; I remember the discussions in the playground being centered around nothing but graphics every time a new console was announced. Nobody talked about the games.

    Nowadays we have incremental updates at best, so now people care less and less about graphics like they used to. Not me, though. I’m still a graphics slut and an absolute removed for path traced games. I’ll play a game I don’t enjoy if it has the latest in graphics tech.

    • Jwmartin0988@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m old and hold the opposite opinion. Those first few generational leaps were amazing. But I feel like we’ve long reached the point that almost any experience can be conveyed with impact.

      I enjoy the new bells and whistles. But these incremental upgrades come coupled with skyrocketing costs, longer development times, and fewer risks. Indie gaming is still innovating of course, but I miss when AAA studios were churning out risky, unique titles.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same. The PS3/360 era was the last one where graphics wowed me. The 2 gens since have been incremental graphically.

    • MJKee9@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m likely older than you.

      Edit: why down vote? Were you born in the 60s?