Donald Trump’s supporters unleashed a wave of death threats and antisemitic and homophobic messages to the judge overseeing his fraud trial, as well as his chief clerk, according to a state court filing this week.

A filing to support New York Justice Arthur Engoron’s opposition to a freeze on a gag order in the case includes a statement from the court’s top security official, who has collected “hundreds of threats, disparaging and harassing comments and antisemitic messages” that followed the former president’s harassment.

Federal prosecutors – who are seeking a separate gag order – shared those threats with the federal appeals court judges who will decide whether Mr Trump should be gagged in his election interference case.

But on Friday, the former president’s attorneys dismissed those threats as “irrelevant”.

  • Red_October@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “All my client did is say that the court personnel should die. That his followers proceeded to threaten to kill them is unrelated.” You have to wonder if the lawyers involved are just trying to do their best to represent a client they know is batshit fucking crazy, or if they’ve actually bought into the madness.

    • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      1 year ago

      He never comes right out and says that though. He whines about how the person is horrible and a traitor and how they are destroying the country, but he never explicitly calls for death or violence. He never tells his followers to attack or harass his targets, but they all know full well what he wants them to do when he selects a target for them.

      This is how mob bosses talk. Giving orders without explicitly stating what they want done. That way they can turn around, just like Trump is doing, and claim that they didn’t tell anyone to harass the judge and the clerk, they were just exercising their right to free speech.

    • LordR@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe they are just the best Trump could find after not paying his former lawyers or they now are in prison.

    • Goku@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am sure there are some lawyers who buy into it but probably not many since lawyer education requires extensive critical reasoning and logic skills.

      The lawyers are there to do a job… Represent their client and make every effort possible in the interest of their client within the bounds of the law.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s amazing. These are the best lawyers trump can find…

    Which means there are worse lawyers…

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Plus, lawyers are obligated to defend their client, even when they do something indefensible. I don’t think even the best lawyer could’ve come up with a better argument.

        • Kleinbonum@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          A lawyer can walk away if the client is engaged in a continuing criminal enterprise, if he’s using the lawyer to perpetuate his illegal scheme, or if the client asks the lawyer to do something illegal himself.

          Feels like chances would be pretty good for Trump’s lawyers to dump him if they really wanted to.

        • TechyDad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Also, Trump is notorious for not listening to his lawyers. His lawyers might tell him to not say something because it increases his legal jeopardy. Then, he goes out and says it anyway.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          they’re obligated to provide a competent defense. Doesn’t mean throwing out useless arguments. when the client is guilty, their job isn’t to prove innocence, but to minimize sentencing. Pissing off the judge is not conducive to that goal.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      In a twist of fate, he actually found better lawyers, but they quit and are suing him for failure to pay.

  • Hairyblue@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Trump is a cult leader. Much like Charles Manson, all he has to do is speak, and there are carzy cultist who will do what he wants.

    Trump: “Stand back and stand by”. The Proud Boys are an armed and violent hate group at Trump command. There are many metally ill people that listen to their leader and they are also standing by for Trump to speak.

      • Hairyblue@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe I watch too many interviews of Trump supporters talking, or listen to them at work. They say crazy things and Trump is able to connect–or more accurately, use them. But you are right, there are many who are not crazy and support Trump. They just give a small knowing smile when they hear their fellow supporters doing the crazy talk.

  • cindylouwhovian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I would vote for any female that met him on a debate stage and dropped references to 1) his mushroom dick 2) his tiny hands and 3) the fact that he had to pay hookers to touch his mushroom dick and keep quiet about it.

    He would call her any sort of horrible names names on stage and her comeback would be ‘don’t you pay $200,000 extra for that?’

    The meltdown would be glorious.

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is possibly a reasonable argument in there. The gag order prohibited Trump from targeting people, not others.

    However this should (hopefully) fall flat against the raw numbers that have been presented: 3rd party threats went up each time Trump and/or his lawyers said something malicious, and they went down after the gag order was put in place.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, and judges have already rejected that argument when it came to dismissing the case.

  • Pratai@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would LOVE to see the person downvoting all the comments here speak up for once and not be such a coward.

    Tell us. Why do you disagree with everyone here. Speak your mind.