• KptnAutismus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    the 1.4 introduced somewherein the 2000s was their last “good” engine. newer models just suffer from downsizing, constant engine problems after around 80K km.

    buy a used honda or a toyota. might even be fuel efficient if you buy a prius for cheap and replace the battery.

    or, you know… buy a small car. the 1st gen aygo easily does 40-50mpg and cost 10K BRAND NEW. but then toyota made it a crossover which uses more fuel and is almost 20K.

    • mihnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      If you’re speaking on the 1.4l turbo, that was introduced in 2012. Have one in my car and it’s a great little engine. Lots of extra room in the engine bay left over though.

      • KptnAutismus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        i think it was an earlier NA one. my brother’s 2006 Polo has it.

        extra room is good, a couple more turbos can’t hurt.

        • mihnt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s aluminum block though. Only so much that little guy can take. I honestly have never looked into many performance upgrades for it outside a new air intake because that giant fuck-off box that’s under my hood needs to go.

          • KptnAutismus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            of course. it’s better to optimize airflow and only slightly increase boost.

            or if you wanna go extreme, swap a bigger, more durable engine in there.

            all at the cost of fuel mileage.