Just under half of likely Iowa GOP caucusgoers who support former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley indicated that they would make a crossover to the Democratic party, saying that they would rather vote for President Biden over former President Trump.

A new NBC News/Des Moines Register/Mediacom poll released just one day before the Iowa caucuses found that 43 percent of Haley backers in the state said they would vote for Biden if Trump is the GOP nominee, while 23 percent say they would vote for the former president. Eight percent said they would vote for independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Overall, 71 percent of likely GOP caucusgoers said they would vote for Trump in 2024, while only 11 percent said they would vote for Biden.

“Haley is consolidating the anti-Trump vote,” J. Ann Selzer, a pollster who has conducted the Iowa survey over the last three decades, told NBC. “She does well with the people who define themselves as anti-Trump.”

    • RunningInRVA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      We should never hope for Trump on the ballot. Even if that means Haley fuming it out with Uncle Joe. Trump should not be allowed to run. Period.

      • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        10 months ago

        THIS. I’ll take someone who hasn’t admitted that they plan on being a day-one dictator over one that has any day.

        • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          10 months ago

          And it shouldn’t be an optional thing. Even if it could potentially help Democrats, or you personally, or whatever, it is unacceptable for him to be allowed to run after refusing to transition power peacefully. It is and should be disqualifying.

          It’s not a matter of preference. It is a matter of what is right and just.

      • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’d be afraid of any GOP win. Trump rewrote the rules and they will never return to center. There is a chance who ever takes the torch from Trump is actually competent and that’s terrifying.

      • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Why do you think Democrat leadership keeps saying things like ‘we need to best Trump at the polls’. They don’t want to take Trump off the ballot because they know it reduces their chances. They’re catering to a fascist so they can win an election. That was the 2016 strategy.

        • webadict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s because every Republican candidate is Trump with less make-up. They all share the same fascist platform.

          You better believe they want Trump removed from the ballot, and there’s two outcomes why: The first and likely is that Trump wins nomination. On states where he’s not on the ballot, there will be people who do not vote at all and this affect downstream voting. The second is that Trump somehow loses nomination. There will indeed be people who write-in Trump, and while this is actually a worse outcome due to downstream voting being affected, this outcome would be largely unaffected by Trump’s removal or not. Primary voters are gonna write things in, and especially Republican ones that feel like the system is rigged.

          • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            They’re literally saying they don’t want him removed from the ballot, California rejected it, Jeffries wants to beat him at the polls. If the Democrat leadership wants him off the ballot they’re certainly not saying so out loud and I have no idea why you think they are.

    • menthol@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      In the event that Trump is in prison, or has a heart attack next month, or whatever, you’d see a depression among MAGA voters in the election. They wouldn’t be enthusiastic and plenty of them would stay home. Trump gets really big turnout in these types and total votes would go below 2012 Republican numbers. For instance in 2020 Trump got 74 million votes. In 2012 Romney got 60 million. In 2008 McCain got 59 million. It’s not that 14 million people shifted to the right after 2012, it’s that they all came out to vote.

    • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Trump shouldn’t be on the ballot. He tried to lead a coup against his own country. He should be done.

      Doesn’t matter if there was 100% chance of Republicans losing with Trump vs. 100% chance of winning without him. He still should not be on the ballot ever again.

      This isn’t about teams or sides or who we want to win. The guy committed treason. We shouldn’t be legitimizing that by letting him run for fucking president. He should be in prison.

      200 years from now, students shouldn’t be learning that we tried to vote a treasonous authoritarian cult leader back into office. They should be learning that treason ends your political career forever.

    • ashok36@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      If Haley is the nominee, there’s no way she beats Biden. Biden votes would be lessened because there’d be no anti-Trump vote but you still have abortion, weed, and student loan forgiveness on the table. Three super-popular policies that the dems have over the repubs and there’s no chance Haley changes tack on abortion or loan forgiveness.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It’s fairly absurd to me that the Republicans think Trump is a force they need to protect at all.

        You can tie a President’s hands pretty thoroughly with control of even one body of Congress, and it’s not like Biden is actually fighting back that hard, because, after all, he ultimately just wants to protect the status quo.

        Ditch Trump, blame the Supreme Court just doing what the Constitution says to do, accept the loss you earned when you picked him in the first place, then whine about Biden’s basic liberalism for another four years and get even more Congress critters in seats because people look at a President crippled by Congress and blame the President, not Congress.

        • Patches@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          The ones in charge of the Republican party have lost the ability to ditch Trump. Theyve sent him too many likes, and prayers and he is too powerful. The GOP needs trump more than Trump needs the GOP.

          He will go to the polls as Third Party and neither will never win again for a long time. Not that - that would be a bad thing, mind you.

            • 0ops@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              10 months ago

              Your first sentence, about the Republicans need to protect Trump. The image is of fasces, the Italian word for a collection of rods (loyalists) bundled around an axe handle (Trump). The purpose of the rods is to take damage for the axe handle to protect it when the axe misses, because the axe is where the “power” is. As such, the rods are disposable, whether they know it or not. The word fasces is where term Fascism derived from

              • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                I figured, but that’s the point, Trump is not only disposable but it’d be in their best interest to dispose of him, just like the Grand Council of Fascism/Victor Emmanuel deposed Mussolini for being an incompetent fuckwit.

                Even the ideology allows for it, anything and any action can be justified for the goal of strengthening the state.

                • 0ops@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I mean, it’s all social constructs. To Trump supporters, Trump should be the state, regardless of any puppeteer’s intentions. And right now Trump is indisposable to the GOP, but only because his followers believe he is, or because his followers believe that enough of the other followers believe it that they have little choice but to play along to stay in the game. It’s a fragile, imaginary power, but it’s also very real. It’s certainly in their best interest to bail from Trump, but we’ll see if they will. That’s what makes fascism so cult-y. The axe doesn’t even have to be real, you just need to convince the fasces

    • Sconrad122@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Obviously, vote no matter what. But I don’t think this proves Nikki is the stronger candidate. For every 1 Nikki voter that votes for Biden over Trump, there may easily be 3 or 4 Trump voters who stay home rather than vote for Haley. Trump achieved unprecedented turnout in 2020 when he lost (because Biden achieved even more unprecedented turnout). I doubt Nikki can capture that same result