A spokesperson for the Russian government clarified that it has rejected requests to interview Vladimir Putin from reputable media outlets

The Kremlin’s first public response to Tucker Carlson’s announcement that he’s landed an interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin was to fact-check the former Fox News host.

On Wednesday, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov confirmed that Carlson had indeed interviewed Putin, but took issue with Carlson’s claim that “not a single Western journalist has bothered” to interview Russia’s president throughout the nation’s war with Ukraine, which has raged for more than two years.

Putin’s refusal to sit down with most Western media outlets likely has less to do with accusations of bias so much as an unwillingness to be subjected to legitimate scrutiny of his government. Russia has been accused of committing atrocities and war crimes in its offensive against Ukraine, including the unlawful executions of civilians. Putin’s government is also infamous for its frequent detainment of political rivals and critics, as well as the cloud of mysterious deaths and poisonings of those in his orbit.

Whether Carlson will question Putin on any of these matters remains to be seen. The former Fox News host’s history of granting softball interviews to controversial influencers, political figures, and authoritarian leaders, indicates this is unlikely. Given everything we know about Putin’s propaganda machine, it’s clear that in Carlson, the Russian government sees a safe opportunity to broadcast its carefully crafted messaging to American viewers.

  • neoman4426@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Or at least if they’re going to insist anyway go with something like latinae that vaguely follows grammatical rules and is able to be pronounced

    • BossDj@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The Latino group I met (college students) said they go with Latinx only because it’s the movement that actually gained traction in recognizing the bias.

      Now the more important piece they said is how extremely patriarchal Latino communities already are, and it’s what they know and we’re raised with, so of course “the majority” think it’s stupid because the majority are older and Christian and very set in their ways. Similar to so many women stuck in shit marriages because they were raised to think that’s their lot in life.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s a fascinating intersectionality issue. The Latino students you met are definitely right about bias and the patriarchy issues. But, it would be incredibly patronizing for someone who isn’t Latino to correct someone who is and say they should be using Latinx instead.

        I think we have to recognize that unless we’re Latino, this isn’t our battle. We can help out of course, but it isn’t our place to tell them what term they should use. That’s something Latinos have to decide on their own, and we use what they ask us to use.

        • BossDj@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Totally agree! Well said.

          I’m just scared that the message “they don’t want it. Stop trying” empowers especially white racist people and disenfranchises the youth who are fighting for the change over time (I don’t actually know our research how large this movement is. Obviously I still used Latino in my own post). Big right wing media gets their message out that progressives are reverse racist, but the more accurate message you said I think isn’t as pervasive, and both sides need to hear it. Especially among minorities who aren’t getting representation or getting their voices heard.

          • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Other thing is, I can’t pretend like I’m a cultural expert. When they say it’s patriarchal, they might be thinking of completely different examples than me. And the ones I’m thinking of might be benign or have a cultural significance that outweighs anything else. It’s better for me to keep my mouth shut on specifics, and let them know I support them and I’ll respect whatever terminology they prefer.

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      In my head, I pronounce it “luhTinks”. I don’t know what is intended and I’m pretty sure that’s not it, but that only makes it more fun to think of it that way.

      • neoman4426@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think the idea is intended as something like “Latin. X.”, which isn’t really any better, sounds like the monster from a racist 50s B movie or something. La-tinx is where my mind always defaults to too though