cross-posted from: https://sopuli.xyz/post/9700996

Nvidia’s AI customers are scared to be seen courting other AI chipmakers for fear of retaliatory shipment delays, says rival firm

  • SoupBrick@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yeah, don’t be unrealistic. We can’t just have a group of competent individuals properly plan out how to dismantle a monopoly. If they don’t hold onto their monopoly, how will we ever see technological advancements?

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      No really. NVIDIA’s entire business is based on one main chip design. How would you brake up a company, that essentially only has one design it implements in various degrees for their products.
      There is literally nothing to break up.

      • Fermion@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Ai accelerators and gaming gpu could definitely be split apart. AMD already uses different architectures for those applications and they have notably smaller engineering teams.

        Raytracing could also ostensibly be spun into a separate division. That’s already split quite a bit in the architecture. Then Intel, AMD and whatever other competitors pop up could license the raytracing tech stack or even buy raytracing chiplets.

        Some of the software solutions like DLSS could be spun off and allowed to license to competitors.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Ai accelerators and gaming gpu could definitely be split apart.

          Raytracing could also ostensibly be spun into a separate division.

          No they can’t, because all Nvidia products are similar base designs at different scales.
          NVIDIA has for many years designed the main chip first, the biggest baddest of them all, used for the very highest end products. All other products are based on selecting parts of that, to make the chips cheaper for their respective markets. There is no reasonable way to split this up.

    • UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      9 months ago

      There is no monopoly. If Nvidia doesn’t play it right in the coming years they won’t hold on to their current position. Nvidia aren’t getting into custom chips just for fun. If the major cloud providers end up using their own custom silicon, that’s a major blow for Nvidia.

      • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        9 months ago

        The point that the article makes is that NVIDIA is pressing current customers by threatening shipping delays, which is an abuse of their power

          • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            They have as much a Monopoly as Google has on search. Sure, there are competitors, and there is a chance that new tech might disrupt them, but they are able to abuse their market position (for example, forcing websites to use Google analytics or be penalised in search results)

            • UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I disagree. Most of the big actors in the cloud/AI space got their own silicon that they are working on which is a big enough concern for Nvidia that they are looking into providing custom solutions. If the CUDA moat breaks, Nvidia will be in a much weaker position.

              The search engine landscape is completely different, although I don’t think you meant that those markets are really directly comparable to be fair.