• MotoAsh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Then maybe America should ACTUALLY be the world police and go stop the horse shit instead of being an arms dealer.

    You can be right in that pulling out would be bad and everyone else IS correct for saying this situation is fucked and the US should not be HELPING a genocide.

    • IMongoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      Born too late to invade the middle east, born too early to invade the middle east, born just in time to invade the middle east.

    • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      So what are you suggesting? America fights Isreal or Hamas? Or you just want to let one side kill the other?

      I know people wish the world was simple but it isn’t and you can’t be neutral on a moving train

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Literally any of those options is better than selling a genocide committer weapons.

        Like I said, the US should ACTUALLY be the world police. Either put an end to the agressors on both sides, or get the civilians out, or both.

        This isn’t rocket science. The answer to, “hey, these two old enemies are fighting on the playground again!” is distinctly NOT to sell the bigger one MORE weapons, stand back, and go, “hey, this isn’t good!” Fucking pathetic that I have to explain this.

        • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          So you are saying you want America to invade the Gaza strip and defeat hamas?

          And you’re fine that other countries will get involved and cause a huge conflict in the region resulting in huge amounts of deaths and suffering?

          I know this feels very simple to you but I really don’t think you’ve considered reality or really thought about any of this. Rocket science looks pretty simple, it’s just a load of fire spraying out a tube, how hard can it be, right?

          And just a note when you say things like ‘fucking pathetic I have to explain this’ it doesn’t make you look like the tough guy genius you think it does, you look like a petulant child that got in a tizzy because your simplistic worldview doesn’t fit to reality.

    • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I like this idea in principle, but the last time there was an international led UN mission to keep the peace, there was a fuckload of Zionist terrorism against the British (colonial) peacekeepers.

      Israel does not accept ANY oversight or restriction on their needs for ‘self defense’, look at the language Netanyahu is using today in response to outside pressure for a ceasefire and peace plan.

      When repeatedly asked to respect the UN ceasefire in Lebanon since 1978, they instead respond by threatening to bomb peacekeepers. Diplomatic exchanges followed, but when the Israeli Air Force did mock bombing runs of UN peacekeepers, the IAF planes were very nearly shot down in self defense.