• Stepos Venzny@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    9 months ago

    The “unanimously” part of this really should have been in the headline, that feels like way bigger news than the rejection itself.

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Honestly, it was the right call. Otherwise, states like Kentucky, Arkansas, and Alabama would kick Democratic candidates off the ballot non-stop.

      If you don’t want Trump, you’ll have to do your part come election day.

      • bermuda@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        9 months ago

        Otherwise, states like Kentucky, Arkansas, and Alabama would kick Democratic candidates off the ballot non-stop.

        I’m sorry, did I miss the part where Democratic candidates incited an insurrection against the Capitol?

        • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          9 months ago

          What part of that do you think Kentucky or Tennessee will care about when they kick all Democrats off the ballot?

        • Jo Miran@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          9 months ago

          I don’t think you understand the implications if the Supreme Court voted to uphold the ruling.

          Is Trump a treasonous piece.of shit? Yes. Do I want theocratic white Christian nationalist courts from MAGA states to have the ability to block any candidate from the federal ballot that doesn’t bow down to their demands? Hell fucking no!

        • agegamon@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Unlike sane people, regressive leaders do not need or care about reality in order to get people removed from the ballot. It absolutely does not matter that progressives have not invited insurrections. They’ll be removed anyway if that precedent is set simply because they are an alternative option, and the voting population is sufficiently decieved or deluded to support it.

        • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          If the power rests with the states, it’s the state supreme courts who make the final determination, so it couldn’t be appealed up to federal courts if a bunch of MAGA judges in Red states decided that “that darn Liberalism brainrot is a Commie insurrection against America, hyuck hyuck!” and kick all Dems off the ballots.

        • ulkesh@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yep, right up there with 5G being set up to control us using the COVID-19 vaccine as a delivery medium. Also, COVID-19 vaccines cause infertility and it’s the Democrats who are controlling it.

          I mean, whatever people believe must be true, right? Can’t let an objective fact get in the way of a good ole echo chamber of morons.

      • SoupBrick@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I feel like this 100% should have been upheld. The reason being that trump engaged in an insurrection, which, according to the 14th amendment, means he cannot run for public office. We have laws for a reason, right? republicans can try to kick (D)s off the ballot, but I would hope they have a damn good reason for it. If not, that is when our court system is supposed to step in.

        • RustyWizard@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          9 months ago

          The court didn’t answer the question of whether or not Trump engaged in insurrection. The question is whether or not a state can kick candidates off the ballet under section 3 of the 14th amendment and the court found that they could not.