YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoTexas judge says Supreme Court ruling means she doesn’t have to officiate same-sex weddingswww.lgbtqnation.comexternal-linkmessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1190arrow-down17
arrow-up1183arrow-down1external-linkTexas judge says Supreme Court ruling means she doesn’t have to officiate same-sex weddingswww.lgbtqnation.comYoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-squareThatGirlKylie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoWould this mean that any case she has presided over in the past that involved an lgbtq+ person could be thrown out now for prejudice?
minus-squarebuddhabound@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoIf I were gay and had been in her court for as much as a traffic ticket, I’d be petitioning to get it thrown out.
Would this mean that any case she has presided over in the past that involved an lgbtq+ person could be thrown out now for prejudice?
If I were gay and had been in her court for as much as a traffic ticket, I’d be petitioning to get it thrown out.