A district judge in Wisconsin has sided with an 11-year-old trans girl over her use of the girls’ toilets and temporarily blocked school officials from preventing her access.

    • TeryVeneno@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tbh this segregation is also stupid as well, it’s completely possible to make non-gendered bathrooms that are safe spaces. High traffic areas with to the floor stalls that are basically rooms are the best option. Low traffic areas are the issue however. But segregation is overall pretty ridiculous even for bathrooms, and implies a failure of our culture to minimize predators.

      • Kleinbonum@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        There have to be millions of restaurants, cafes and other places that already have unisex bathrooms, and apparently that’s never been a problem. Weird, huh?

      • vern1@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly. The Red Rocks Amphitheater in Colorado does exactly this and it makes so much sense. Also by far the nicest bathrooms I’ve ever seen at a concert venue

      • letsgo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, but that’s not an option here, because in response to a suggestion that she use a non-gendered bathroom ‘she had suffered “emotional distress and mental-health effects, including thoughts of self-harm, nightmares, embarrassment, social isolation and stigma, and lowered self-esteem”’ That’s copied directly from the article.

        Non-gendered bathrooms would appear to be the ultimate solution here, so obvs this girl’s going to be majorly traumatised every time she needs a wazz in that setup.

        • Zorque@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          She was being forced to use a gender-neutral bathroom in lieu of existing gendered bathrooms. Basically the administration was denying her her identity at a very basic level. It wasn’t just about bathrooms, it was about allowing someone to identify as their own gender.

          A gender-neutral bathroom is a solution without separate gendered bathrooms, not in concert with them.

          It’s basically saying “If you can’t be one, we won’t let you be the other, so you have to go to the weird people place to do your business”. Kind of a fucked up thing to tell someone, much less a child.

    • DessertStorms@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Because most of them are happy to use one of the existing options you’ve already mentioned, it is people like you who have the problem, so why shouldn’t you be the ones to be segregated?

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why should we? Because they make you uncomfortable?

      Why should we legislate what other people do based on your discomfort? They’re not trying to change the way you live your life, they’re not getting in your face by using a bathroom (unless you’re blocking their path for some reason), they’re just trying to live their life to the best of their ability. Why is that so discomforting for you?

    • galaxyawesome@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Stalls are already “segregated.” Who cares if you have to wash your hands next to someone who looks a little different?

        • Zorque@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Mostly republican politicians who can leverage that as a way to motivate their base.

          Unless you plan on molesting people on your trip to the bathroom… should we be worried about that?