This comment section: “Actually I’m pretty sure the bike fell over for reasons unrelated to the stick”

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    In this thread: User ThuleanPerspective apparently losing their fucking minds and then having their entire account comment history removed. I’ve never been so intrigued to know what crazy nonsense this person posts.

    Update: Looked closer at their history. Managed to comment in dozens of threads per minute. Likely a bot that got removed. That’s more boring than I’d hoped.

  • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Had an older co-worker who kept saying that Andrew Tate had some real gems and that he was just telling young men to give up videogames and hit the gym if they wanted some self worth.

    So one day I looked him dead in the eye and gave him my best impersonation of a 1950’s radio voice and said. " Young ladies if you don’t work on refining and improving your womanly figure with clean living and labourous exercise and not stop wasting your time reading novels then how will you ever expect to catch a husband?!"

    I would like to say that I scored a point but he just sputtered and went on being horrible.

    • quindraco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Andrew Tate is the absolute worst, but it is also a fact - one that has been true for all of recorded history - that competing with each other for female attention is a generally popular male motivation. And when a guy doesn’t do those things, he can expect mockery. Do you have anything nice to say about neckbeards? No? Didn’t think so.

      • S_204@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        You’re being downvoted for pointing out human nature. You’re not wrong, we compete for females. We’re animals, even if people want to lie and claim we’ve progressed. We have not.

          • S_204@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Well ya, you’re a freak of nature by literal definition, of course you wouldn’t agree. Humans, like all animals have a drive to reproduce. You don’t have that drive, you’re not relevant.

            You’re going to interpret this literal fact as homophobia too which is kinda funny if you knew me LoL.

        • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          One of the best things taught to me growing up is that you don’t have to prove yourself to anyone. There are shallow people, but why waste time with them? Why not go with people who are more open-minded, have good control to not give into superficial and shallow biological instincts, and will accept you for who you are?

          • S_204@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yes, we’re all taught that. Our evolutionary instinct is stronger than your teachings, more often than not.

            Open minded people open their legs too. That’s just reality.

            • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Murder and rape is also natural but not everyone does it and we frown upon it. We have laws against it.

              Giving in to instincts that are not productive is showing weakness.

              • S_204@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                Ya, we live in a society and we should place restrictions around our innate nature, we’ve learned about the perils of not doing so.

                That doesn’t in anyway mean it’s not our nature. It’s weird people are offended by this reality.

                • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  We don’t go on physical fights to win over a women. It’s destructive. How difficult is it to understand? We don’t act on destructive instincts because it’s not productive and, well, destructive.

                  I always say this to others, but you must be with running with a bad crowd to hold such warped view.

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Me, a young man venturing out into the world:

    Never saying the wacko stuff championed by Tate and instead just being socially awkward and strangely passionate about FOSS and motorcycles:

    Can’t find a girlfriend. Seriously, why is this so hard?

    • dumpsterlid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      One of the reasons it is so hard is that right now is an extremely difficult time for people, so I think meeting people is even more difficult. If you are stressed out about making rent every month, guess what socialization and finding a partner becomes a distant priority vs just surviving.

      I promise you though there are plenty of women out there who find social awkward people into niche hobbies sexy, especially if you are a genuinely nice person (which, beyond a superficial impression, is pretty much always the truly sexy thing about a person).

      The problem is that those women are sitting at home exhausted and sad from modern life the same way you are, and it is hard to meet people outside the context of a bar.

      If you are a nice person you are sexy and enough the way you are, what needs to change is the brutal grind of modern life, not you.

      I mean just from a basic freetime calculation… women didn’t use to be able to work, which is fucked up, but it is also fucked up how much everybody’s lives are swallowed up by work at least in the US, and if you compare the difficulty of finding a women to hit it off with vs when women weren’t working as much…. I mean you have to cut yourself slack. The women of your dreams probably isn’t at the bar or wherever public meeting space you are, or actively on the dating app because they are stressed out and working all the time just like you :(

  • thorbot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Have you been on Reddit lately? Every post has about 50% of comments that are incel type statements just talking about how they’ll be forever alone, they have no good traits, etc. it’s fucking pathetic

  • mommykink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    You got it backwards mate. Young men are falling for those charlatans because they provide an easy solution to the loneliness epidemic (of which young men are the most likely victims).

    • nac82@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      its the world’s fault for me being a complete piece of shit

      Lmao, the victim complex of the most abusive subgroup of men on the planet is hilarious.

      • mommykink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Please, tell me more about your immunity to propaganda.

        The reality is that there’s a lot of money to be made in telling young, single, socially removed men what they want to hear and there are just as many people ready to make that money.

        Identifying a person as a victim of one thing isn’t an excuse for any other harm that they perpetuate.

        • nac82@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I didn’t say anything about immunity to propaganda.

          Feel free to address what I said, though. I’m mocking the ironic victim complex of abusive individuals.

          • mommykink@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            My grevience is a very basic application of social Marxism.

            I’m saying that the “most abusive subgroup of men” aren’t born, they’re made through propaganda and charlatans. That makes them victims, which I have some sympathy for, even if they go on to perpetuate an awful cycle of misogyny. I’m just critical of these kinds of arguments like the OP which place the blame on the perpetuaters instead of the sources.

            • nac82@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Despite this, shame is still a valid application of positive punishment to active participants of an abusive subgroup.

              Go be the carrot to somebody who needs a philosophy 101 course to justify defending actively harmful forms of propoganda from criticism. I’m not your guy, I have my own objectives in this discourse.

              Ultimately, none of this invalidates the observation of an ironic use of a victim complex.

              • mommykink@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                “Valid” in what sense? Of course you’re allowed to shame people who perpetuate terrible actions/thoughts against women. But when that group was literally created by and has grown through pre-existing, socially reinforced thoughts of shame and inadequacy, I’m going to hold you slightly responsible for that problem continuing.

                • nac82@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  I’m going to hold you responsible for defending them from criticism they need to face. You are creating a safe space for abusive ideologies to fester.

  • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The comments are quite saddening, and also quite worrying.

    This isn’t to put women’s issues down, but men have problems too. There’s a reason why young men turn to these grifters and get manipulated by them.

    Even above all of that, assuming you don’t agree, it’s a problem. We’re building up generations of uneducated and toxic men led by these role models. We can’t just shrug that off and say it’s not our issue, because at some point it is going to be our issue.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is a problem that I really feel like gets no attention.

      With all the focus on women’s rights, young men feel neglected. And modern feminism does imply that men can’t really talk about issues because that comes from a place of privilege.

      This isn’t the only time it happened. Male victims of sexual harassment and assault were pretty much entirely shut out of #MeToo.

      So, young men feel marginalized and they will listen to whoever makes sense.

      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        modern feminism does imply that men can’t really talk about issues?

        not to be all “source?” but — source?

        This statement feels full of selection bias. Let’s assume Angela Davis literally said this, does that mean Judith Butler agrees?

        But I imagine it’s more that this was said by a semi-anonymous rage bait account on a social media platform.

        That’s not to say such things aren’t hurtful - they are - but in the same way FirstnameBunchOfNumbers on Twitter says stupid shit all the time - eg all unions are all always bad and are literally communism - that doesn’t speak for the entirety of tradespeoples.

    • Jennykichu@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I find it telling that the meme is about men following idiotic “influencers” and so many people here are like “I identify with that man on the bike but my problems are unrelated”

      • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I wouldn’t say identify. Pretty sure many of us don’t follow Andrew Tate or influencers in general. We’re showing empathy for the general situation. Sorry it bothered you.

  • LazyBane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Backwards thinking.

    Andrew Tate isn’t creating these young men out of well adjusted people.

    Young men today face a mountain of issues with zero sympathy from the people or institutions around them. And grifters prey on these men.

    Having grown up in the “teach boys not to rape” era of progrssive rhetoric, it’s actually insane to see all these people just insist being in a guy’s world is all sunshine and rainbows and all these men are just awful people falling of their own accord.

    Young men get told some pretty damaging things growing up, even from progressive people.

    Everyone has problems, lots of people are coming of age all kinds of fucked up, and we can’t fix this by implying it’s all their own doing.

    • Yewb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      You mean there is more to this than a black and white interpretation of the issues??

      Young men in many areas are ridiculously hopeless with despair - its not really something that is talked about.

  • Zyratoxx@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    For me, the reason it is hard out there is because I am super careful when trying to pick someone up and they end up mistaking my pickup lines for friendly banter and I end up getting friendzoned.

    Plus I am super choosy myself and take long to crush on someone and then take super long to get over a crush. (o﹏o)

    But I agree that listening to toxic males like Tate will likely not make it easier.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        Ελληνικά
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Best way I’ve heard it.

        Friendzone is bullshit, because women are not vending machines that accept nice and dispense sex.

  • balderdash@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m not a Rogan meathead, but women are absolutely super choosey these days. Dating apps have given women an inflated sense of their own (dating) worth, and they largely want tall, handsome, well-off, slightly older men.

    Of course I’m painting with a broad brush here, but this post is talking in generalities anyway.

    • dumpsterlid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I’m not a Rogan meathead, but women are absolutely super choosey these days. Dating apps have given women an inflated sense of their own (dating) worth, and they largely want tall, handsome, well-off, slightly older men.

      If this is happening even a little bit it is because of the distorting forces of capitalism and addictive phone apps are warping peoples interactions on dating apps.

      I promise you, if you are genuinely a pretty nice human being who tries to be a good person there are plenty of women out there who want to fuck you. Really, the world is full of horny women who get hot and bothered by realizing that cute man they just met is also really sweet and kind. You don’t need fit any particular idea of a man, I understand it feels like you do and that is an awful feeling but it is a feeling not the reality.

      Also women are probably more choosey because they are by large exhausted from work places that grind them down, trying to make rent, healthcare bullshit and any number of other struggles of modern life, just like you. They want to make sure that use their vanishing amount of free time, energy and money pursuing somebody that isn’t going to be a dead end.

      If you want the quickest route to more men finding women who are interested in them, then support unionization, the social safety net, workers rights, and progressive legislation on housing. We need to take better care of people so that they have more free time, energy and money to pursue love and sex.