• Neato@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Looking over the wikipedia page on this mushroom and all the similar, very edible ones…Yeah I’m never foraging mushrooms.

    • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, I carefully read the description of its distinguishing features, studied the photo, and concluded I have no idea what I’m looking at and how to tell them apart.

      • Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m really good at spotting differences or inconsistencies, I’m totally lost with mushrooms though, and I go multiple times every Autumn with a woman in her 70’s. She is very clear about what we are looking for. She throws out at least half of what I gather.

    • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Is the main visual difference just the stem or whatever it’s called being much longer?

      • Risk@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        IIRC, the only definitive way to ID mushrooms is by making a spore print - and even then you need to know what you’re doing.

        Just doesn’t seem worth the risk to me.

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          nah it’s generally fairly easy to ID mushrooms, the problem is just that if you miss a feature and mistake it for another, you’ll fucking liquidize from the inside out.

          This is the same reason that you never touch something that looks like a carrot plant in the wild, because it could be that one plant that kills you 3 times over.

          I agree that it’s generally not worth the risk though, hence why those who pick mushrooms (which is pretty standard to do here in the nordics) stick to like 5 species who have no dangerous lookalikes and actually taste good and are easy to find.

          Here in sweden 90% of what people pick is chanterelles or boletes, whose entire families look effectively the same and at worst simply don’t taste good. Boletes have ONE slightly toxic species in sweden, and it’s bright red and only grows on one island in the baltic sea.

  • sushibowl@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Looks like a destroying angel (e.g. Amanita virosa) to me. This and the death cap together account for the vast majority of mushroom poisonings in the world. Cooking it will not destroy the toxins, nor will acid. Symptoms tend to appear 5-24 hours after eating, too late to pump the stomach. Half a mushroom can be enough to kill you.

    I don’t recommend going out to pick mushrooms unless you know what you’re doing. If you do, stay away from the white ones. You can still get terrible stomach cramps and diarrhea from other colors of mushrooms, but the white ones have the most dangerous species.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Easiest way to avoid problems I’ve heard is to never pick any mushroom with ribbed underside. If the underside looks like a sponge, it’s usually safe to eat. At least where I’m from.

      • sushibowl@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Might be valid advice for some regions, I don’t know. But mushrooms tend to vary quite a bit in appearance. Sometimes ribbed species don’t have very visible ribs, or younger mushrooms don’t quite have all the characteristics of their mature form. If you really want to get into picking mushrooms, there’s often local groups you can join with a resident expert who can tell you which ones are safe.

  • Devdogg@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    There are old mushroom foragers and then there are bold ones. There are no bold, old mushroom foragers.

    • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      There are no bold, old mushroom foragers

      Sure there are, they just have to not eat what they picked up.

      Source: friend’s mom once gave food poisoning to the whole family by serving them an omelet made with mushrooms she found, but didn’t eat it herself. Fortunately it was merely mushrooms of the “fucks up your stomach” variety.

      • Devdogg@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        “Once” has no effect on my statement. There are no Bold, Old mushroom foragers.

        • FreddyDunningKruger@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          In his story, his friend’s mother boldly picked mushrooms from her backyard, cooked them into an omelet for the family, but DID NOT EAT the omelet herself.

          Nothing would stop her from growing old while continuing this pattern of bold collecting, although a stint in prison might make for an earlier retirement than expected from the foraging scene.

          • Syn_Attck@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Is L*mmy more pedantic than r*ddit? Is L*mmy literally H*tler? You decide.