Kinda proud of this, so forgive me while I brag. I found a likely “phone home” tracking image in DocuSeal. I searched around: there was an extant issue about the image. I asked the devs: would they accept a PR to remove the image? A maintainer responded quickly that they were not interested in a PR to remove it, so I forked it in minutes with my tiny hack, built a new Docker image and re-deployed to my server after making a one-line change in a Docker Compose file.

Here’s the hack: https://github.com/meonkeys/docuseal/commit/e710678d

Happy to share my compose config as well if folks are interested.

I do want to put in a plug for DocuSeal: they made an excellent thing. It’s a fast and beautiful app for adding signatures to PDFs, similar to DocuSign or HelloSign, but awesomely AGPL licensed and easy to self-host. I got it running in minutes and it worked very well. I support what they’re doing and I want to see them succeed. OpenSign looks cool too but I haven’t tried that one yet.

So yeah. Self-hosting and FOSS FTW!


cross-posted to: reddit r/selfhosted (there’s no additional content in the post at that link. Sorry, I should have posted on Lemmy first! Anyway, above is the copy/pasted post so you can get it without having to use reddit)

  • neko@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Loading external images will reveal to the site where it’s loaded from at least these things:

    • User’s IP
    • Useragent string
    • Referrer

    Also it can set third-party cookies which can be used to track specific user.

    I don’t know if this project processes any of that data, but outside images can be used for tracking purposes.

    At least it would be a good idea to limit some of this things for that img tag by setting some attributes that prevent referrer and cookies from being sent.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      AGAIN.

      This is not “phoning home” as claimed. It is not a SECURITY RISK as claimed. It is a privacy want/complaint/nag at the very VERY least. THIS IS ALSO NOT A PRIVACY FOCUSED PROJECT.

      Y’all need to get better hobbies, seriously.