• Almighty Olive 🫒@aus.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, how is that any different from all the other policies that the LNP get’s their grubby hands on…

    Just add the Voice to the cycle hell that all the other policies are subjected to… at least then indigenous issues will finally get somewhat treated the same as the rest 😅

    • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not, and that’s an issue. It shouldn’t be something that can be gutted by the government to the point of it being irrelevant.

      • Almighty Olive 🫒@aus.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, but the way I equate it with is the NBN… sure the LNP NBN is far worse than what was planned, but some NBN is better than no NBN.

        Sure, the Voice can be gutted, but there has to be a voice and it has to represent aboriginal people.

        It’s not ideal policy, but I definitely don’t want to make the mistake the Greens did with the Carbon Tax… voted against something imperfect (Rudd tax) and now they get nothing as no majors want to touch it after the Gillard debacle.

        The benefit of this proposal also makes the Voice flexible and can actually be improved upon, something that couldn’t be done if aspects were rigidly defined by the constitution.

        Again, it ain’t perfect policy… but then again perfection is the enemy of good enough.