Yeah, I try to save my snarky or sarcastic comments to top level replies about the article itself, I could do better for certain.
Maintaining a good vibe is an important issue, I used to be more active on Beehaw which was all about that and I still am cognizant of it when I comment there.
!Superbowl@lemmy.world is one of the cooler communities with your frequent photo posts, we could use a lot more of communities like those.
Ultimately the points don’t matter, yet it genuinely feels bad when you or someone that you’re certain is posting in good faith gets downvoted, which we need to deal with if we want to encourage posting. Stuff like hiding scores for 20 minutes or vote fuzzing can deal with this issue, but at the same time, I do appreciate having the transparency that Reddit had taken away for years.
A lot of negative news coming in (which has been over the past month) does get reflected in the snarkiness of my comments, but I know that maintaining a positive tone adds a feedback loop for the non-trolls to contribute positively or at least interact genuinely. In threads like this, I try to reward people that have contributed with a similar effort reply.
I’m glad you enjoy my content. I always try to maintain it as an oasis for positive, peaceful, and factual content.
I miss Beehaw. I didn’t get it at first since most of Lemmy felt the same, but as time went on, Beehaw kept the same vibe while other instances started to feel more like Reddit. Sadly, Beehaw walled off their garden a bit too much for me, which I respect their choice, but I was already doing the bulk of my posting on World and wanted to keep growing the audience.
Downvotes for trolling or misinformation are important, but when they’re used just to be removed, I don’t get the point. It’s rude and discourages the small number of commenters we have.
Snarking at depressing news can be healthy to help process it, but I wish it would focus on the problems and the people causing it, but not be outright crappy to people. Scrolling the threads about Senator Inhofe yesterday, the guy sucked and did a lot of bad things, but the gloating over a guy’s death isn’t a great look for us. I won’t be shedding any tears, but publicly cheering a guy’s death isn’t something I like keeping company with.
Yeah, I try to save my snarky or sarcastic comments to top level replies about the article itself, I could do better for certain.
Maintaining a good vibe is an important issue, I used to be more active on Beehaw which was all about that and I still am cognizant of it when I comment there.
!Superbowl@lemmy.world is one of the cooler communities with your frequent photo posts, we could use a lot more of communities like those.
Ultimately the points don’t matter, yet it genuinely feels bad when you or someone that you’re certain is posting in good faith gets downvoted, which we need to deal with if we want to encourage posting. Stuff like hiding scores for 20 minutes or vote fuzzing can deal with this issue, but at the same time, I do appreciate having the transparency that Reddit had taken away for years.
A lot of negative news coming in (which has been over the past month) does get reflected in the snarkiness of my comments, but I know that maintaining a positive tone adds a feedback loop for the non-trolls to contribute positively or at least interact genuinely. In threads like this, I try to reward people that have contributed with a similar effort reply.
I’m glad you enjoy my content. I always try to maintain it as an oasis for positive, peaceful, and factual content.
I miss Beehaw. I didn’t get it at first since most of Lemmy felt the same, but as time went on, Beehaw kept the same vibe while other instances started to feel more like Reddit. Sadly, Beehaw walled off their garden a bit too much for me, which I respect their choice, but I was already doing the bulk of my posting on World and wanted to keep growing the audience.
Downvotes for trolling or misinformation are important, but when they’re used just to be removed, I don’t get the point. It’s rude and discourages the small number of commenters we have.
Snarking at depressing news can be healthy to help process it, but I wish it would focus on the problems and the people causing it, but not be outright crappy to people. Scrolling the threads about Senator Inhofe yesterday, the guy sucked and did a lot of bad things, but the gloating over a guy’s death isn’t a great look for us. I won’t be shedding any tears, but publicly cheering a guy’s death isn’t something I like keeping company with.