• Bibliotectress@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 months ago

    You’re so fucking stupid. Maybe you should read any of those books you claim are being pulled as “pornography.”

    Source: me, high school librarian

    • StaySquared@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Source: me, high school librarian

      groomer*

      Fixed.

      The Brooklyn Public Library’s Books Unbanned project makes its collection available to young adults and teens who face censorship, book bans, and political challenges. The collection includes thousands of audiobooks and ebooks, which can be accessed on a computer, Kindle, or phone or tablet using the Libby app. Some books in the collection include:

      Gender Queer by Maia Kobabe

      All Boys Aren’t Blue by George M. Johnson

      The Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison

      • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        It really says something about your worldview that you automatically assume any librarian is a groomer

            • StaySquared@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              4 months ago

              By providing an underaged child access/directions to adult - pornographic material, for one. That in of itself should be considered disseminating indecent material to minors.

              Actually that’s a good project to conduct… baiting librarians to see if they’re willing to guide children to material that is deemed indecent.

              • TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                4 months ago

                I ask you to look up what books are in this books unbanned project and point to the pornography. Or do you truly believe books about mental health, LGBTQ and diversity awareness are pornography?

              • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                4 months ago

                I want to assume you’re a good person so I’m going to let you know: limiting a teenager’s access to books that discuss sex in a healthy way isn’t corrupting them. Educators that want them to have access to this aren’t groomers.

                Sex/sexuality are part of human nature, and every teen is developing a sense of self that will include these aspects. If they don’t have curated materials to learn from, they’ll seek these out themselves–through the internet. Porn is an awful and unhealthy way to learn about this stuff.

                Outrage media will try to tell you that first grade teachers are giving instructions for sex acts, and that’s just demonstrably untrue.

                • StaySquared@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  So why can’t educators stick to the state mandated sex ed programs? Why veer off the curriculum standardized by the state?

                  • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Because the places that ban these kind of books also don’t have sex ed programs. I’d wager this Oklahoma district goes by an abstinence program.

      • Land_Strider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 months ago

        Being able to read opens access to the written pornographic material. Being able to write enables accidentally writing pornographic sentences. Please unlearn reading and writing as the first thing you do tomorrow.

          • Land_Strider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 months ago

            If you think that having an option to learn about life and know something about it before being exposed to the dangers going blind into an experience is bad and grooming, I have news for you. You have been groomed into being a breeder-only type of human being with all these anti sex-education (even optional for only those who seek it) showing it.

            Go breed like rabbits and shut up about people learning how to safely engage in sex and how to turn it into an enjoyable experience rather than a sneaky risky fleeting act that can put on them lifelong unwanted responsibilities.

              • Land_Strider@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                How is letting someone know about the facets of a topic is preparing them to use abused in that topic? Especially without an agent meddling in between. What, will the books themselves have sex?

                I’m aware that enough knowledge about sex and reproduction alone does not warrant a valid consent for sex just by itself and there are many more matters that should be taken into account, including enough experience in regular life matters to understand the scope of agreement for it, which a child or teen would not have, but at least enabling access to the material by which they can learn about it on their own volition is a good start to construct personal identity.

                Ask the fucking priests that touched you in places and called it something bullshit like putting god in you if they support anyone learning and constructing their own sexual identity through intermediary-free inanimate objects is safe and sound, you’ll get probably get more touching as they teach you what they think.

          • TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Do you truly think everyone constantly telling you you’re wrong and disagreeing with you vehemently makes you more correct?

            • StaySquared@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              No… I’m well aware that this community is a leftist/progressive community and your form of progress is a degenerate, decaying form of progress. And when I see something absurd, I call it out or at the very least question it. You’re right, I’m wrong, because I go against the grain. And you feel like you’re right because of your collectivism. Doesn’t make it right nor moral.

                • StaySquared@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I think there’s people whose moral compass doesn’t align with the common man on earth. And said people just see themselves as progressives for the better good without actually thinking about the repercussions. You may feel you’re doing something right, but in reality it’s negatively impactful.

            • StaySquared@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              4 months ago

              Oh, let me know if you need more videos of children and parents and communities reading some of the literature… I can assure you, BlazeTV is the least of your worries.